Bug 226142 - Merge Review: mikmod
Summary: Merge Review: mikmod
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On: 223711
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-01-31 19:40 UTC by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2010-07-12 17:01 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-12-07 06:38:46 UTC
Type: ---
bugs.michael: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 19:40:46 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: mikmod

Initial Owner: stransky@redhat.com

Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2007-12-06 20:33:28 UTC
> Summary: A MOD music file player

Summary: Music module player

That is because "MOD" is a synonym for the .mod file format of
SoundTracker (and simple derivatives), but not for the more
recent and advanced file formats, such as those mentioned in
the %description. Those are much more commonly called "modules".

> %description

s/MOD music file/music module/g

> Release: 5%{?dist}

Could you please squeeze the "beta1" in there (even if it's too
late to prefix with "0.")? For example:

Release: 6.beta1%{?dist}

> $ rpmlint  /tmp/mikmod-3.2.2-5.fc9.src.rpm 
> mikmod.src:30: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

That command belongs at the beginning of %install, not %build.

Especially the last item must be fixed. The other ones are minor.


Comment 2 Jindrich Novy 2007-12-07 06:38:46 UTC
Applied. Thanks!

Comment 3 Peter Robinson 2010-06-10 20:12:13 UTC
Package Change Request
Package Name: mikmod
New Branches: EL-6
Owners: pbrobinson sdz

Comment 4 Kevin Fenzi 2010-06-11 04:21:40 UTC
Have you checked with jnovy here to see if they would like to maintain in EPEL?

Comment 5 Jindrich Novy 2010-07-11 14:01:41 UTC
Kevin, please could you process the request as noted in comment #3? The reasons are same as in bug 345261.


Comment 6 Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-12 17:01:30 UTC
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.