Fedora Merge Review: mikmod http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mikmod/ Initial Owner: stransky
> Summary: A MOD music file player Summary: Music module player That is because "MOD" is a synonym for the .mod file format of SoundTracker (and simple derivatives), but not for the more recent and advanced file formats, such as those mentioned in the %description. Those are much more commonly called "modules". > %description s/MOD music file/music module/g > Release: 5%{?dist} Could you please squeeze the "beta1" in there (even if it's too late to prefix with "0.")? For example: Release: 6.beta1%{?dist} > $ rpmlint /tmp/mikmod-3.2.2-5.fc9.src.rpm > mikmod.src:30: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT That command belongs at the beginning of %install, not %build. Especially the last item must be fixed. The other ones are minor. APPROVED
Applied. Thanks!
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mikmod New Branches: EL-6 Owners: pbrobinson sdz
Have you checked with jnovy here to see if they would like to maintain in EPEL?
Kevin, please could you process the request as noted in comment #3? The reasons are same as in bug 345261. Thanks!
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).