Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via
Initial Owner: firstname.lastname@example.org
Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages.
E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0
E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0
E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postin
E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postun
I think these are problematic. Or is there some reason an ldconfig pass isn't
W: xorg-x11-drv-via-devel no-documentation
W: xorg-x11-drv-via mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 13, tab: line 3)
Plus 56 undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints in /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0
and /usr/lib64/libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0.0. I note that the same issues are present
in the XvMC libs from the i810 driver. Maybe there's something special about
* File and directory ownership looks good.
* debuginfo package looks good.
Yeah, that's intentional. libwhateverXvMC.so are client-side drivers, the
missing symbols come from libXvMC.so itself, and they're only ever dlopened so
there's no reason to ldconfig.
Marking as fixed in rawhide, please reopen if I'm wrong.