Bug 2270334 - [rgw/LC transition]: A few buckets stuck in UNINITIAL state when applying LC policy to multiple buckets
Summary: [rgw/LC transition]: A few buckets stuck in UNINITIAL state when applying LC ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW
Version: 7.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 7.1
Assignee: Soumya Koduri
QA Contact: Vidushi Mishra
Akash Raj
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2271626
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-03-19 17:54 UTC by Vidushi Mishra
Modified: 2024-07-02 17:24 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-18.2.1-105.el9cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Bucket lifecycle processing rules are no longer stalled Previously, enumeration of per-shard bucket-lifecycle rules contained a logical error related to concurrent removal of lifecycle rules for a bucket. Due to this, a shard could enter a state which would stall processing of that shard, causing some bucket lifecycle rules to not be processed. With this fix, enumeration can now skip past a removed entry and the lifecycle processing stalls related to this issue are resolved.
Clone Of:
: 2271626 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-06-13 14:29:52 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github ceph ceph pull 56486 0 None open rgw/lc: advance head if the current entry doesn't exist 2024-03-27 17:33:42 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-8566 0 None None None 2024-03-19 17:55:49 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2024:3925 0 None None None 2024-06-13 14:30:00 UTC

Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2024-06-13 14:29:52 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Critical: Red Hat Ceph Storage 7.1 security, enhancements, and bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3925
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.