Bug 227121 - Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation
Summary: Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 252110
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Hans de Goede
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-02-02 18:00 UTC by Rafael H. Schloming
Modified: 2014-12-01 23:14 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-02-27 00:29:49 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Rafael H. Schloming 2007-02-02 18:00:21 UTC
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rafaels/specs/wstx-2.9.3-1jpp.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://jpackage.hmdc.harvard.edu/JPackage/1.7/generic/SRPMS.free/wstx-2.9.3-1jpp.src.rpm
Description: Woodstox is a high-performance validating namespace-aware
StAX-compliant (JSR-173) Open Source XML-processor written
in Java.
XML processor means that it handles both input (== parsing)
and output (== writing, serialization)), as well as
supporting tasks such as validation.

J2ME libraries for wstx.

Javadoc for wstx.

Documents for wstx.

Comment 1 Vivek Lakshmanan 2007-08-14 00:29:50 UTC
*** Bug 252110 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Vivek Lakshmanan 2007-08-14 00:30:33 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> *** Bug 252110 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

A newer version requested for review above


Comment 3 Hans de Goede 2007-09-23 18:54:03 UTC
I would like to review this as I need it for freecol which I'm packaging. Can
you please provide a new srpm based on the latest jpackage srpm for me to review?

Alternatively we could do things the other way I around, that I create the
package and you review.


Comment 4 Hans de Goede 2008-01-04 09:22:24 UTC
ping?


Comment 5 Hans de Goede 2008-02-26 21:00:09 UTC
ping?

Vivek, it looks like Rafael does not have the time for this package. I would
like to suggest that we reopen bug 252110 and close this one as a dup of 252110
instead of the otherway around, then I can review your newer package in bug 252110.


Comment 6 Vivek Lakshmanan 2008-02-27 00:29:49 UTC
I have reopened the bug. Note that if you are interested in this package I
highly encourage you to take over ownership. I cant commit to maintaining
packages for the next little while,. I am sure there is a way to transfer
ownership of the review/package to you and I would be happy to do the review (if
I am allowed to somehow be the reporter and the reviewer..)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 252110 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.