Bug 252110 - Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation
Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
http://annogen.codehaus.org/
: Reopened
: 227121 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-08-13 18:18 EDT by Vivek Lakshmanan
Modified: 2008-06-26 02:51 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-25 21:06:18 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Vivek Lakshmanan 2007-08-13 18:18:25 EDT
Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/wstx.spec
SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/wstx-3.1.1-1jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm

Woodstox is a high-performance validating namespace-aware
StAX-compliant (JSR-173) Open Source XML-processor written
in Java.
XML processor means that it handles both input (== parsing)
and output (== writing, serialization)), as well as
supporting tasks such as validation.
Needed for supporting application servers
Comment 1 Vivek Lakshmanan 2007-08-13 20:29:47 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227121 ***
Comment 2 Vivek Lakshmanan 2008-02-26 19:29:49 EST
*** Bug 227121 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Hans de Goede 2008-03-01 13:57:14 EST
Hmm,

When I suggested in Bug 227121 to mark it as a duplicate of this and to reopen
this, and that I then would review this, I was kind of hoping that I would only
be reviewing it, as I'm not mighty familiar with java. The only reason I'm
interested in wstx, is because it beats the stax implementation shipped by
default with icedtea by a factor of 10 when it comes to speed, making the
loading of freecol (a game written in java I maintain) about 10 times faster.

So perhaps a co-maintainership is the best solution, I can take either role
(submitter or reviewer) now, and then later we maintain this together?
Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2008-06-25 21:06:18 EDT
Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response.

Hans, given that Vivek hasn't responded at all to any of the reviews he opened,
might I suggest you consider just submitting this yourself?
Comment 5 Hans de Goede 2008-06-26 02:51:34 EDT
(In reply to comment #4)
> Hans, given that Vivek hasn't responded at all to any of the reviews he opened,
> might I suggest you consider just submitting this yourself?

I would love to but currently I'm investing all my time into:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterWebcamSupport

So maybe sometime in the future.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.