Bug 2272936 - mgr/snap_schedule: make monthly spec consistent with other parts of ceph
Summary: mgr/snap_schedule: make monthly spec consistent with other parts of ceph
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: CephFS
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 7.0z2
Assignee: Venky Shankar
QA Contact: sumr
Disha Walvekar
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2264348 2270220
Blocks: 2267617 2270485
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-04-03 11:12 UTC by Milind Changire
Modified: 2024-05-09 17:14 UTC (History)
15 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-18.2.0-176.el9cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, the snap-schedule repeat specification and retention specification for monthly snapshots was not consistent with other Ceph components. With this fix, the specifications are changed from 'm' to 'M' and it is now consistent with other Ceph components. For example, to retain 5 monthly snapshots, you need to issue the following command: # ceph fs snap-schedule retention add /some/path M 5
Clone Of: 2270220
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-05-07 12:11:24 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-8733 0 None None None 2024-04-03 11:20:12 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2024:2743 0 None None None 2024-05-07 12:11:30 UTC

Comment 8 Amarnath 2024-04-16 06:02:41 UTC 
Hi Venky,

Could you please confirm if this BZ needs to be added to the 7.0z2 release notes? If so, please provide the doc type and the doc text.

Regards,
Amarnath
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2024-05-07 12:11:24 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 7.0 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2024:2743
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.