Bug 228617 - compiz-devel requires libdecoration.so.0
compiz-devel requires libdecoration.so.0
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: compiz (Show other bugs)
6
x86_64 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Kristian Høgsberg
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-02-13 18:34 EST by Jerry James
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-08-21 12:06:58 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Jerry James 2007-02-13 18:34:34 EST
Description of problem:
yum update failed today because

--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: libdecoration.so.0 for package: compiz-devel
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: libdecoration.so.0 is needed by package compiz-devel

This only happened on my x86_64 machines.  The i386 machines all happily upgraded.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
compiz-devel-0.3.6-2.fc6

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install a previous version of compiz and compiz-devel
2. yum update

Actual results:
The yum update fails with the error message given above.

Expected results:
Yum should successfully update compiz and compiz-devel.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Jerry James 2007-02-21 22:20:40 EST
It turns out that we had both the x86_64 and i386 versions of compiz-devel
installed.  Uninstalling the i386 version let the yum update go through.  This
means that the i386 compiz-devel currently in x86_64 updates is not installable.
Comment 2 Kristian Høgsberg 2007-08-15 18:41:28 EDT
I think I tracked this one down.  Is it possible for you to reproduce the same
setup and see if it is fixed with compiz-0.5.2-5.0ec3ec.fc8?  Thanks.
Comment 3 Jerry James 2007-08-16 16:21:47 EDT
I just changed jobs and moved and, alas, I no longer have access to an x86_64
machine.  I'm i686 only until I feel rich enough to buy a new computer. :-(
Comment 4 Kristian Høgsberg 2007-08-21 12:06:58 EDT
Heh, let me know if you get an x86_64 and still see this problem.  In the
meantime, I haven't seen this reported from anybody else, and I'll close this
for now.  Thanks.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.