Spec URL:http://punjabi.sourceforge.net/dict/aspell-pa.spec SRPM URL: http://punjabi.sourceforge.net/dict/aspell-pa-0.01-1.src.rpm Description: Aspell dictionary for Punjabi SOURCE tar files: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/0index.html
Mock build output is fine. But rpmlint output on SRPM gave W: aspell-pa rpm-buildroot-usage %build DEST_DIR = $RPM_BUILD_ROOT $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. W: aspell-pa rpm-buildroot-usage %build dictdir = ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/aspell-0.60 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. W: aspell-pa rpm-buildroot-usage %build datadir = ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/aspell-0.60 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. And the usual output assumed on aspell rpms also reported on this package RPM E: aspell-pa no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. E: aspell-pa only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
Created attachment 149668 [details] Modified Clean SPEC file Use this SPEC file and resubmit the package.
thanks following is link SPEC: http://punjabi.sourceforge.net/dict/aspell-pa.spec SRPM: http://punjabi.sourceforge.net/dict/aspell-pa-0.01-1.src.rpm thanks
Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and RPM. But following messages are ignorable E: aspell-pa no-binary E: aspell-pa only-non-binary-in-usr-lib E: aspell-pa configure-without-libdir-spec + SPEC file contains explanation about above warnings. + source files match upstream. de336d6ef55ad6fa81f8903765c6c95d aspell6-pa-0.01-1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Requires: aspell >= 12:0.60 + Provides: aspell-pa = 0.01-1 + Not a GUI APP. APPROVED.
You need to follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure to request the cvs module and branches.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aspell-pa Short Description: Punjabi Dictionary for Aspell Owners: aalam Branches: devel InitialCC: aalam
Please don't put the same person in both owner and intialcc.
ok, thanks, changed New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aspell-pa Short Description: Punjabi Dictionary for Aspell Owners: aalam Branches: devel InitialCC: panemade
Package is available with following details: aspell-pa.i386 0.01-1.fc7
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: aspell-pa New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
cvs done.