Bug 2318410 - Review Request: perl-Alien-libtermkey - Alien wrapping for libtermkey
Summary: Review Request: perl-Alien-libtermkey - Alien wrapping for libtermkey
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Xavier Bachelot
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Alien-libte...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2318412
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-10-13 14:47 UTC by Emmanuel Seyman
Modified: 2024-10-26 02:58 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-10-26 02:58:53 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
xavier: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Emmanuel Seyman 2024-10-13 14:47:29 UTC
Spec URL: https://eseyman.fedorapeople.org/perl-Alien-libtermkey/perl-Alien-libtermkey.spec
SRPM URL: https://eseyman.fedorapeople.org/perl-Alien-libtermkey/perl-Alien-libtermkey-0.22-1.fc40.src.rpm
Description:
This CPAN distribution wraps the C library libtermkey in a wrapper suitable
to drive CPAN and other Perl-related build infrastructure.

Fedora Account System Username: eseyman
Rpmlint Output: 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 4 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.3 s

Comment 1 Xavier Bachelot 2024-10-16 17:00:28 UTC
- The following line is handled by perl-generators and can be dropped
Requires:       perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version))

- The following line
BuildRequires:  pkgconfig(termkey)
implies
BuildRequires:  libtermkey
so the latter can be dropped

- tangerine suggests perl(POSIX) is a builtime requirement, while perl(ExtUtils::CChecker) is a runtime requirement

Comment 2 Emmanuel Seyman 2024-10-16 20:29:34 UTC
(In reply to Xavier Bachelot from comment #1)
>
> - The following line is handled by perl-generators and can be dropped

Indeed. Done.

> BuildRequires:  libtermkey
> so the latter can be dropped

Done.

> - tangerine suggests perl(POSIX) is a builtime requirement, while
> perl(ExtUtils::CChecker) is a runtime requirement

Fixed.

Spec URL: https://eseyman.fedorapeople.org/perl-Alien-libtermkey/perl-Alien-libtermkey.spec
SRPM URL: https://eseyman.fedorapeople.org/perl-Alien-libtermkey/perl-Alien-libtermkey-0.22-2.fc40.src.rpm

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2024-10-16 20:35:53 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8148948
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2318410-perl-alien-libtermkey/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08148948-perl-Alien-libtermkey/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Xavier Bachelot 2024-10-17 17:58:53 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version 1
     and/or The Perl 5 License", "GNU General Public License". 8 files have
     unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /tmp/2318410-perl-
     Alien-libtermkey/licensecheck.txt
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
     /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Alien(perl-Alien-Base-ModuleBuild, perl-
     Alien-ProtoBuf, perl-Alien-SDL, alien, perl-Alien-Base, perl-Alien-
     Build-Plugin-Download-GitLab, perl-Alien-Packages, perl-Alien-ZMQ,
     perl-Alien-ROOT, perl-Alien-Build-MB, perl-Alien-Font-Uni)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 4851 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Perl:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: perl-Alien-libtermkey-0.22-2.fc42.noarch.rpm
          perl-Alien-libtermkey-0.22-2.fc42.src.rpm
=============================================================================================== rpmlint session starts ==============================================================================================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp5dnuam9q')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

========================================================== 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 7 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s =========================================================




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1

 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 3 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/P/PE/PEVANS/Alien-libtermkey-0.22.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : fbc812abac8aaf4a57a70668dac0bcd45fc7a0377ef1b2a8470957f7986a7490
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : fbc812abac8aaf4a57a70668dac0bcd45fc7a0377ef1b2a8470957f7986a7490


Requires
--------
perl-Alien-libtermkey (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    perl(ExtUtils::CChecker)
    perl(POSIX)
    perl-libs



Provides
--------
perl-Alien-libtermkey:
    perl(Alien::libtermkey)
    perl-Alien-libtermkey



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2318410
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Perl, Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Python, Java, SugarActivity, fonts, PHP, Haskell, Ocaml, R, C/C++
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 5 Xavier Bachelot 2024-10-17 17:59:27 UTC
Package is APPROVED.

Comment 6 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-10-17 18:28:36 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Alien-libtermkey

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2024-10-17 19:04:20 UTC
FEDORA-2024-0f81e01a04 (perl-Alien-libtermkey-0.22-2.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-0f81e01a04

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2024-10-18 01:47:53 UTC
FEDORA-2024-0f81e01a04 has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-0f81e01a04 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-0f81e01a04

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2024-10-26 02:58:53 UTC
FEDORA-2024-0f81e01a04 (perl-Alien-libtermkey-0.22-2.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.