Bug 232523 - tcpdump-3.9.4-10.fc6.i386.rpm and libpcap-0.9.4-10.fc6.i386.rpm aren't signed
Summary: tcpdump-3.9.4-10.fc6.i386.rpm and libpcap-0.9.4-10.fc6.i386.rpm aren't signed
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 232638
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: tcpdump
Version: 6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Miroslav Lichvar
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 232575 232581 232593 232683 232745 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-03-15 23:01 UTC by Radek Bíba
Modified: 2013-01-10 04:13 UTC (History)
14 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-03-16 15:39:18 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Radek Bíba 2007-03-15 23:01:48 UTC 
Description of problem:
The two rpm packages in FC6 updates aren't signed so yum refuses to do any
updates whatsoever. A workaround to have at least the remaining packages
updated is to --exclude them on yum command line.

I know it's not a problem of tcpdump and libpcap themselves but apparently
there's no bugzilla component for Fedora update system to file a bug against.
Comment 2 Kai Hambrecht 2007-03-16 07:19:30 UTC 
at least, also the packages libpcap-devel-0.9.4-10.fc6.i386.rpm and
arpwatch-2.1a13-17.fc6.i386.rpm are not signed.
Comment 3 Miroslav Lichvar 2007-03-16 07:59:00 UTC 
*** Bug 232575 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Miroslav Lichvar 2007-03-16 07:59:13 UTC 
*** Bug 232581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Miroslav Lichvar 2007-03-16 08:24:37 UTC 
Related packages from FC5 update are also not signed.

arpwatch-2.1a13-15.fc5.i386.rpm
libpcap-0.9.4-4.fc5.i386.rpm
tcpdump-3.9.4-4.fc5.i386.rpm
Comment 6 Trevor Cordes 2007-03-16 11:04:49 UTC 
"me too"

You can cheat with: gpgcheck=0 in yum.conf yum.repo.d/* until it's fixed.  Ya,
not the best solution...
Comment 7 Jesse Keating 2007-03-16 11:39:22 UTC 
I'm fixing them.  Stupid race in the updates system.
Comment 8 Miroslav Lichvar 2007-03-16 11:44:01 UTC 
*** Bug 232593 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Karsten Hopp 2007-03-16 15:39:18 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 232638 ***
Comment 10 Radek Bíba 2007-03-16 15:50:51 UTC 
Whatever you say...
Comment 11 Miroslav Lichvar 2007-03-16 16:49:54 UTC 
*** Bug 232683 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Miroslav Lichvar 2007-03-17 09:49:54 UTC 
*** Bug 232745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.