Bug 232967 - LSPP: Add audit rule bit operators patch
LSPP: Add audit rule bit operators patch
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
5.0
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Eric Paris
Martin Jenner
:
Depends On:
Blocks: RHEL5LSPPCertTracker 233186
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-03-19 14:12 EDT by Steve Grubb
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:07 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2007-0959
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-07 14:44:45 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
patch against RHEL5 (2.40 KB, patch)
2007-03-23 14:24 EDT, Eric Paris
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Steve Grubb 2007-03-19 14:12:14 EDT
Description of problem:
There is not good way to audit syscalls that have bit mapped options. A patch
was sent to the linux-audit mail list adding this capability. This is not
strictly required for LSPP, but helps customers.
Comment 1 Steve Grubb 2007-03-23 14:01:34 EDT
Patch has been applied and is working correctly. Tested on lspp.70 kernel.
Comment 2 Eric Paris 2007-03-23 14:24:49 EDT
Created attachment 150785 [details]
patch against RHEL5

RHEL5 version of the patch
Comment 3 Eric Paris 2007-03-23 14:25:59 EDT
removing from LSPP list.  I don't remember seeing an upstream patch for this,
just the RHEL5 version, but maybe i'm mistaken.  I'll have to look into that
before i submit for internal inclusion.
Comment 6 Don Zickus 2007-06-15 20:30:56 EDT
in 2.6.18-27.el5
You can download this test kernel from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5
Comment 8 Mike Gahagan 2007-09-12 17:52:03 EDT
Confirmed patch is in the -46.el5 kernel
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 14:44:45 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0959.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.