Bug 233186 - LSPP: Add audit rule bit operators patch
Summary: LSPP: Add audit rule bit operators patch
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: audit
Version: 5.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Steve Grubb
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 232967
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-03-20 20:01 UTC by Steve Grubb
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2007-0602
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-07 17:03:24 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2007:0602 normal SHIPPED_LIVE audit bug fix and enhancement update 2007-10-30 15:35:36 UTC

Description Steve Grubb 2007-03-20 20:01:33 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #232967 +++

Description of problem:
There is not good way to audit syscalls that have bit mapped options. A patch
was sent to the linux-audit mail list adding this capability. This is not
strictly required for LSPP, but helps customers.

This bz is to track the user space piece of it.

Comment 2 Steve Grubb 2007-03-21 00:48:05 UTC
The patch introduces the mask and bit test operators for creating audit rules.
For example, if you wanted to audit chmod syscalls that change a file to be
executable, with this patch applied you would do this:

auditctl -a always,entry -S chmod -F arg1&0111

As its is now, you would have to audit all chmods and search for the ones that
have the execute bit set...this is wasteful to say the least.

audit-1.5.1 already has this capability, this is a backport.

Comment 4 Eric Paris 2007-03-26 20:39:33 UTC
Stated not required for evaluation.  Steve, can we remove the LSPP whiteboard
mark so it doesn't come up on list and won't be considered a blocker?

Comment 5 Steve Grubb 2007-03-27 21:25:28 UTC
The lspp.70 kernel tests good with the patch included.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 17:03:24 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0602.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.