Please investigate these rpmlint warnings:

W: SDLmm undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libSDLmm-0.1.so.8.0.0
__cxa_pure_virtual
W: SDLmm undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libSDLmm-0.1.so.8.0.0
_ZNSs6assignEPKcm
W: SDLmm undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libSDLmm-0.1.so.8.0.0
__cxa_guard_release
W: SDLmm undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libSDLmm-0.1.so.8.0.0 _ZdlPv
W: SDLmm undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libSDLmm-0.1.so.8.0.0
_ZNSt8ios_base4InitD1Ev
W: SDLmm undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libSDLmm-0.1.so.8.0.0
__cxa_guard_acquire
W: SDLmm undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libSDLmm-0.1.so.8.0.0
_ZNSt8ios_base4InitC1Ev
W: SDLmm unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libSDLmm-0.1.so.8.0.0
/lib64/libm.so.6

Good catch, I really should teach myself to not only run rpmlint on the build
packages, but also on the installed packages.

Here is a new version fixing this:
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/SDLmm.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/SDLmm-0.1.8-2.fc7.src.rpm

rpmlint warnings still left on the installed package:
W: SDLmm unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libSDLmm-0.1.so.8.0.0
/lib64/libpthread.so.0

This is caused by the output of "sdl-config --libs", and harmless since SDL
itself does indeed require pthreads.

==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ====
- rpmlint output clean
- package named according to package naming guidelines
- spec file name matches %{name}
- package meets packaging guidelines
- licensed with open source compatible license
- license matches actual license
- license included in %doc
- spec written in American English
- spec file legible
- sources match upstream
0a05d27d1aed72af3c7a37b6378f50e5  SDLmm-0.1.8.tar.bz2
- package successfully compiles and builds on FC-6 x86_64
- all build dependencies listed in BR
- no locales
- proper use of ldconfig in %post/un sections
- package is not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
- directories it does not create owned by filesystem
- no duplicates in %files
- package contains proper %clean
- macro usage is consistent
- contains code
- no large documentation
- %doc does not affect runtime
- header files located in devel subpackage
- no static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- libraries w/o suffix in devel
- devel has fully versioned requires
- no libtool archives
- not a GUI application
- package does not own files or directories owned by other packages


==== MUST FIX ====
- Source0 URL is incorrect, the directory is sdlmm, not SDLmm


==== SHOULD FIX ====
- use of -n %{name} is redundant in the %post/un sections

Both fixed, see:
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/SDLmm.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/SDLmm-0.1.8-3.fc7.src.rpm

I believe the new patch adds these warnings:
sdlmm_audio.cpp
sdlmm_srect.cpp: In function 'SDLmm::SRect SDLmm::Intersect(const SDLmm::SRect&,
const SDLmm::SRect&)':
sdlmm_srect.cpp:77: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of
data type
sdlmm_srect.cpp:78: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of
data type
sdlmm_srect.cpp: In function 'SDLmm::SRect SDLmm::Union(const SDLmm::SRect&,
const SDLmm::SRect&)':
sdlmm_srect.cpp:88: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of
data type
sdlmm_srect.cpp:89: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of
data type

Should investigate, but not a blocker.

All other must fix items have been fixed.

*** APPROVED ***

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name:      SDLmm
Short Description: C++ interface for the popular SDL library
Owners:            j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl
Branches:          FC-6 devel
InitialCC:         <empty>

Thanks for the review!

Imported and build, closing.

p.s.

I've updated (fixed) the patch to no longer cause those valid compiler warnings.