Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~cmadams/perl-X-Tiny/perl-X-Tiny.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~cmadams/perl-X-Tiny/perl-X-Tiny-0.22-1.fc41.src.rpm Description: This stripped-down exception framework provides a baseline of functionality for distributions that want to expose exception hierarchies with minimal fuss. It's a pattern that I implemented in some other distributions I created and didn't want to copy/paste around. Fedora Account System Username: cmadams
@linux Hi Chris, There is one more provides: "perl(DB)" You need to add: %global __provides_exclude %{?__provides_exclude:%__provides_exclude|}^perl\\(DB\\)$
FYI: I created a PR to upstream for removing Test::Simple dependency: https://github.com/FGasper/p5-X-Tiny/pull/3
Oh, nice catch on the provides, thanks. Updated: Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~cmadams/perl-X-Tiny/perl-X-Tiny.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~cmadams/perl-X-Tiny/perl-X-Tiny-0.22-2.fc41.src.rpm
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8853698 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2346427-perl-x-tiny/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08853698-perl-X-Tiny/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
@linux I found that you need to add BuildRequires for coreutils. This is used by %{_fixperms}. FYI: I created patch for cpanspec (https://github.com/michal-josef-spacek/cpanspec/commit/327eb8b16ac1cae6acd1e23cbf2e8797faf33706) And you need to add sed to BuildRequires (by your sed -i '/Test::Simple/d' Makefile.PL)
I'll change the sed to perl (should have done that to start). The idea to require coreutils seems like it could be a little over-requires... how %{_fixperms} is implemented is pretty opaque (and rpm itself already requires coreutils). Checking the current perl SRPMs, there are a whole lot that use %{_fixperms} but don't BuildRequire coreutils. The %{_fixperms} macro could change, or call a tool not in coreutils, and there'd be a lot of extra BuildRequires. I'll add it (I also see a lot of perl SRPMs that do BuildRequire it, about half), but I'm wondering if maybe that shouldn't be the norm; just expect that the package that provides the macro also BuildRequires anything needed to implement the macro. Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~cmadams/perl-X-Tiny/perl-X-Tiny.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~cmadams/perl-X-Tiny/perl-X-Tiny-0.22-3.fc41.src.rpm
Created attachment 2083353 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 8853698 to 8859436
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8859436 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2346427-perl-x-tiny/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08859436-perl-X-Tiny/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-X-Tiny-0.22-3.fc43.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep -v rpmlib 1 perl(constant) 1 perl-libs 1 perl(Module::Runtime) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) There is missing perl(overload) for run time. Probably not detected by perl-generator $ rpm -qp --provides perl-X-Tiny-0.22-3.fc43.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(X::Tiny::Base) 1 perl(X::Tiny) = 0.22 1 perl-X-Tiny = 0.22-3.fc43 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-X-Tiny* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings, 12 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 0.7 s There is funny rpm lint issue: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/perl-X-Tiny/LICENSE I don't know what about it. In case of coreutils, you are right. Delivering of macro should be dependency to coreutils, ideally.
Ok, there is information (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues/#incorrect-fsf-address) about incorrect-fsf-address. I will report.
Reported: https://github.com/FGasper/p5-X-Tiny/issues/4
Ahh yeah, the overload module is used via an eval, probably why it's missed. Added a manual Requires:. I also saw the rpmlint bit about the address, didn't think I should go editing somebody else's license, so I left it alone. If I get some time, I'll try to summarize the bit about %{_fixperms} and coreutils and ask fedora-devel's opinion (since the perl packages appear to be split about half and half). Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~cmadams/perl-X-Tiny/perl-X-Tiny.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~cmadams/perl-X-Tiny/perl-X-Tiny-0.22-4.fc41.src.rpm
There seems to be some problem with the following file. SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~cmadams/perl-X-Tiny/perl-X-Tiny-0.22-4.fc41.src.rpm Fetching it results in a 404 Not Found error. Please make sure the URL is correct and publicly available. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-X-Tiny-0.22-4.fc43.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep -v rpmlib 1 perl(constant) 1 perl-libs 1 perl(Module::Runtime) 1 perl(overload) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-X-Tiny-0.22-4.fc43.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(X::Tiny::Base) 1 perl(X::Tiny) = 0.22 1 perl-X-Tiny = 0.22-4.fc43 Binary provides are Ok. rpmlint: perl-X-Tiny.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/perl-X-Tiny/LICENSE reported, ok The package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guide lines.
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-X-Tiny
FEDORA-2025-6a17ddff5e (perl-X-Tiny-0.22-4.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-6a17ddff5e
FEDORA-2025-4a3629324e (perl-X-Tiny-0.22-4.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-4a3629324e
FEDORA-2025-4a3629324e has been pushed to the Fedora 42 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-4a3629324e \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-4a3629324e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2025-6a17ddff5e has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-6a17ddff5e \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-6a17ddff5e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2025-4a3629324e (perl-X-Tiny-0.22-4.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2025-6a17ddff5e (perl-X-Tiny-0.22-4.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.