Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tifinagh (Moroccan) - most important (missed from bug 2318769) - covered by google-noto-sans-tifinagh-fonts - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Moroccan_Amazigh - https://zgh.wikipedia.org/wiki/ (10,000+ articles) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylheti_Nagri (11 million speakers) - covered by google-noto-sans-syloti-nagri-fonts - https://syl.wikipedia.org/ (1000+ articles) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_language - covered by google-noto-sans-mongolian-fonts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tai_Nuea_language (Tai Le) - covered by google-noto-sans-tai-le-fonts - https://tdd.wikipedia.org/ (100+ articles) I think this would only leave: Church Slavonic as tofu on wikipedia more or less (which doesn't seem covered by Noto): - https://www.wikipedia.org/ - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. https://zgh.wikipedia.org/wiki/ 2. https://tdd.wikipedia.org/ 3. https://syl.wikipedia.org/
I would suggest to move google-noto-sans-tifinagh-fonts from '-kab' to default-fonts-ber (Berber).
fontconfig doesn't support zgh, tdd, and syl
fontconfig has ber_dz and ber_ma though, ber_dz is the same to kab but ber_ma isn't. So simply default-fonts-ber may be not sufficient.
For reference, posting same comment here from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318769#c18 fontconfig has both ber-dz and ber-ma as well as kab though, ber-dz is same to kab but ber-ma has different coverage. Taking a look back on the introduction of default-fonts-kab, that was maybe wrong because Noto Sans Tifinagh* has ber-ma coverage only: $ for i in /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTifinagh*; do fc-query -f "%{file}:%{lang}\n" $i; done /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTifinagh-Regular.ttf:ber-ma /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTifinaghAPT-Regular.ttf:ber-ma /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTifinaghAdrar-Regular.ttf:ber-ma /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTifinaghAgrawImazighen-Regular.ttf:ber-ma /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTifinaghAhaggar-Regular.ttf:ber-ma /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTifinaghAir-Regular.ttf:ber-ma /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTifinaghAzawagh-Regular.ttf:ber-ma /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTifinaghGhat-Regular.ttf:ber-ma /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTifinaghHawad-Regular.ttf:ber-ma /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTifinaghRhissaIxa-Regular.ttf:ber-ma /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTifinaghSIL-Regular.ttf:ber-ma /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTifinaghTawellemmet-Regular.ttf:ber-ma Then we should rename default-fonts-kab to default-fonts-ber_MA and need to find out a font which has ber-dz or kab coverage if we want to provide a font for them.
Okay sorry, sounds like renaming -kab is perhaps not such a good idea then. May still be good to consider installing the font by default. Though I think Latin is preferred modern script iiuc. Wonder if there is any better reference page/site than Wikipedia..
We would rather rename -kab to -ber_MA as I mentioned the above. NotoSansTifinagh*.ttf is what we currenctly have in default-fonts-kab and they don't have kab coverage as noted.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 45 development cycle. Changing version to 45.