Bug 2383874 - Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises - Another Promises library, this time implemented in XS for performance
Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises - Another Promises library, this tim...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Oliver
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/AnyEvent-XS...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2383876
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-07-28 10:16 UTC by Xavier Bachelot
Modified: 2025-10-22 16:10 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises-0.006-2.fc43
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-10-22 16:10:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
mavit: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Xavier Bachelot 2025-07-28 10:16:17 UTC
Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises.spec
SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises-0.006-1.fc43.src.rpm
Description:
This library provides a Promises interface, written in XS for performance,
conforming to the Promises/A+ specification.
Fedora Account System Username: xavierb

Comment 1 Peter Oliver 2025-07-29 12:31:08 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package owns directories that are also owned by a package that this depends on.  See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_directory_ownership
- No licence text.  We should ask upstream to include it.

===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated". 11 files have unknown license. Detailed
     output of licensecheck in /home/mavit/src/fedora/reviews/2383874-perl-
     AnyEvent-XSPromises/licensecheck.txt
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
     /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/AnyEvent(perl-AnyEvent)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 561 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Perl:
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises-0.006-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm
          perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises-0.006-1.fc43.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpqnm86342')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 7 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.4 s 




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises-debuginfo-0.006-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp_ys4_h70')]
checks: 32, packages: 1

 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 5 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s 





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 2

 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 9 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.5 s 



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises: /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/AnyEvent/XSPromises/XSPromises.so

Source checksums
----------------
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/AnyEvent/AnyEvent-XSPromises-0.006.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 16088a6420d4c1d4c628a9b7cdf7a7286de7dfdf6b408eb571846f6780bc74e6
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 16088a6420d4c1d4c628a9b7cdf7a7286de7dfdf6b408eb571846f6780bc74e6


Requires
--------
perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libperl.so.5.42()(64bit)
    perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.42.0)
    perl(:VERSION)
    perl(AnyEvent)
    perl(AnyEvent::XSPromises::Loader)
    perl(Exporter)
    perl(XSLoader)
    perl(strict)
    perl(warnings)
    perl-libs
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises:
    perl(AnyEvent::XSPromises)
    perl(AnyEvent::XSPromises::Loader)
    perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises
    perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2383874
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Perl, Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Python, Haskell, Ocaml, fonts, R, C/C++, SugarActivity, PHP, Java
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 2 Xavier Bachelot 2025-08-05 13:54:33 UTC
Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises.spec
SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises-0.006-2.fc43.src.rpm

- Fixed directory ownership
- Opened an issue about the missing license file, which should hopefully show up there shortly:
  https://rt.cpan.org/Dist/Display.html?Status=__Active__;Queue=AnyEvent-XSPromises

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2025-08-06 04:12:42 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9379763
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2383874-perl-anyevent-xspromises/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09379763-perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- Explicit dependency on perl-devel is not allowed unless building architecture-specific code which links to libperl.so
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Perl/

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Peter Oliver 2025-08-06 13:20:54 UTC
Approved.

Comment 5 Xavier Bachelot 2025-08-06 13:40:47 UTC
Thanks for the review Oliver !

Comment 6 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-08-06 13:41:09 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-AnyEvent-XSPromises


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.