Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 239303
Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI
Last modified: 2007-11-30 17:12:04 EST
Description: Input library for GGI
hey whats reason behind opening same package review request twice?
Closing this duplicate bug.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 239939 ***
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs.
+ source files match upstream.
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
- License text is NOT included in package.
+ %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc files are present.
+ -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Provides: config(libgii) = 1.0.2-1.fc7 file.so keytrans.so libgg.so.1
libgii.so.1 linux_evdev.so linux_joy.so linux_kbd.so linux_mouse.so lk201.so
mouse.so null.so save.so spaceorb.so stdin.so tcp.so
SHOULD: Ask upstream to include License text file in tarball. There is already
one packaging draft submitted on how to request upstream to include license in
New Package CVS Request
Package Name: libgii
Short Description: Input library for GGI
Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel
License has been requested and is now added to upstream cvs repository!
It will be bundled with next release...
Cvs is done.