SRPM:https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-pyjson5/python-pyjson5-2.0.0-1.fc44.src.rpm SPEC:https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-pyjson5/python-pyjson5.spec Description: The serializer returns ASCII data that can safely be used in an HTML template. Apostrophes, ampersands, greater-than, and less-then signs are encoded as unicode escaped sequences.
There seems to be some problem with the following file. SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-pyjson5/python-pyjson5-2.0.0-1.fc44.src.rpm Fetching it results in a 404 Not Found error. Please make sure the URL is correct and publicly available. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright* MIT License", "*No copyright* Apache License and/or MIT License", "MIT License", "Boost Software License 1.0". 496 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/benson/Projects/fedora-packaging/reviews/python- pyjson5/2402008-python-pyjson5/licensecheck.txt [ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/python3.14, /usr/lib64/python3.14/site-packages [ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). See: (this test has no URL) [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-pyjson5-2.0.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm python-pyjson5-2.0.0-1.fc44.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.7.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpo2rwapwf')] checks: 32, packages: 2 python-pyjson5.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot JSON5 serializer and parser for Python 3 written in Cython. python3-pyjson5.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot JSON5 serializer and parser for Python 3 written in Cython. python-pyjson5.src: E: spelling-error ('serializer', 'Summary(en_US) serializer -> serialize, serializes, serialized') python-pyjson5.src: E: spelling-error ('serializer', '%description -l en_US serializer -> serialize, serializes, serialized') python-pyjson5.src: E: spelling-error ('unicode', '%description -l en_US unicode -> Unicode, uni code, uni-code') python3-pyjson5.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('serializer', 'Summary(en_US) serializer -> serialize, serializes, serialized') python3-pyjson5.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('serializer', '%description -l en_US serializer -> serialize, serializes, serialized') python3-pyjson5.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('unicode', '%description -l en_US unicode -> Unicode, uni code, uni-code') python3-pyjson5.x86_64: W: no-documentation python-pyjson5.src: E: description-line-too-long The serializer returns ASCII data that can safely be used in an HTML template. Apostrophes, ampersands, greater-than, and less-then signs are encoded as unicode escaped sequences. python3-pyjson5.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long The serializer returns ASCII data that can safely be used in an HTML template. Apostrophes, ampersands, greater-than, and less-then signs are encoded as unicode escaped sequences. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 3 warnings, 7 filtered, 8 badness; has taken 0.7 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.7.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 python3-pyjson5.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot JSON5 serializer and parser for Python 3 written in Cython. python3-pyjson5.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('serializer', 'Summary(en_US) serializer -> serialize, serializes, serialized') python3-pyjson5.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('serializer', '%description -l en_US serializer -> serialize, serializes, serialized') python3-pyjson5.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('unicode', '%description -l en_US unicode -> Unicode, uni code, uni-code') python3-pyjson5.x86_64: W: no-documentation python3-pyjson5.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long The serializer returns ASCII data that can safely be used in an HTML template. Apostrophes, ampersands, greater-than, and less-then signs are encoded as unicode escaped sequences. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 2 warnings, 3 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 0.2 s Unversioned so-files -------------------- python3-pyjson5: /usr/lib64/python3.14/site-packages/pyjson5/pyjson5.cpython-314-x86_64-linux-gnu.so Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/p/pyjson5/pyjson5-2.0.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 7ccc98586cf87dfeadfa76de8df4c9cb0c3d21d1b559e28812dd9633748d6e25 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7ccc98586cf87dfeadfa76de8df4c9cb0c3d21d1b559e28812dd9633748d6e25 Requires -------- python3-pyjson5 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) python(abi) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- python3-pyjson5: python-pyjson5 python3-pyjson5 python3-pyjson5(x86-64) python3.14-pyjson5 python3.14dist(pyjson5) python3dist(pyjson5) Diff spec file in url and in SRPM --------------------------------- --- /home/fedora-packaging/reviews/python-pyjson5/2402008-python-pyjson5/srpm/python-pyjson5.spec 2025-10-07 00:00:00.067546889 +0300 +++ /home/fedora-packaging/reviews/python-pyjson5/2402008-python-pyjson5/srpm-unpacked/python-pyjson5.spec 2025-10-06 03:00:00.000000000 +0300 @@ -1,2 +1,12 @@ +## START: Set by rpmautospec +## (rpmautospec version 0.8.1) +## RPMAUTOSPEC: autorelease, autochangelog +%define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua: + release_number = 1; + base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}")); + print(release_number + base_release_number - 1); +}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{!?-n:%{?dist}} +## END: Set by rpmautospec + Name: python-pyjson5 Version: 2.0.0 @@ -49,3 +59,6 @@ %changelog -%autochangelog +## START: Generated by rpmautospec +* Mon Oct 06 2025 John Doe <packager> - 2.0.0-1 +- Uncommitted changes +## END: Generated by rpmautospec Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2402008 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, C/C++, Python, Generic Disabled plugins: R, Haskell, SugarActivity, PHP, fonts, Java, Ocaml, Perl Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH Comments: a) Consider building the documentation b) One file is under Boost Software license: Boost Software License 1.0 -------------------------- python-pyjson5-2.0.0-build/pyjson5-2.0.0/src/dragonbox.cc Please add this to the list of license c) A header only library is bundled: https://github.com/lemire/fast_double_parser/tree/0f1fe9902d25847c8348e2f93ddc9dbe5521eab6 Either package it or indicate it as being bundled d) Can tests be run, see: https://github.com/Kijewski/pyjson5/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L49-L53
Updated, same URLs. I didn't build the docs because we don't ship the required sphinx plugin.
SRPM:https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-pyjson5/python-pyjson5-2.0.0-1.fc44.src.rpm SPEC:https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-pyjson5/python-pyjson5.spec [fedora-review-service-build]
[fedora-review-service-build]
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9874014 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2402008-python-pyjson5/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09874014-python-pyjson5/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10056065 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2402008-python-pyjson5/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10056065-python-pyjson5/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
a) Changing PYTHONPATH="${PYTHONPATH}:%{buildroot}%{python3_sitearch}" ./scripts/run-tests.py PYTHONPATH="${PYTHONPATH}:%{buildroot}%{python3_sitearch}" ./scripts/run-minefield-test.py to PYTHONPATH="${PYTHONPATH}:%{buildroot}%{python3_sitearch}" %python3 /scripts/run-tests.py PYTHONPATH="${PYTHONPATH}:%{buildroot}%{python3_sitearch}" %python3 /scripts/run-minefield-test.py enables the package to build https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=141558538 b) Please also shorten description line.
Done, same URLs.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright* MIT License", "*No copyright* Apache License and/or MIT License", "MIT License", "Boost Software License 1.0". 496 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/fedora-packaging/reviews/python-pyjson5/2402008-python- pyjson5/licensecheck.txt [ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/python3.14/site- packages, /usr/lib64/python3.14 [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). See: (this test has no URL) [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-pyjson5-2.0.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm python-pyjson5-2.0.0-1.fc44.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp_90rchdq')] checks: 32, packages: 2 python-pyjson5.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot JSON5 serializer and parser for Python 3 written in Cython. python3-pyjson5.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot JSON5 serializer and parser for Python 3 written in Cython. python-pyjson5.src: E: spelling-error ('serializer', 'Summary(en_US) serializer -> serialize, serializes, serialized') python-pyjson5.src: E: spelling-error ('serializer', '%description -l en_US serializer -> serialize, serializes, serialized') python3-pyjson5.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('serializer', 'Summary(en_US) serializer -> serialize, serializes, serialized') python3-pyjson5.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('serializer', '%description -l en_US serializer -> serialize, serializes, serialized') python3-pyjson5.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings, 8 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 0.8 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 python3-pyjson5.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot JSON5 serializer and parser for Python 3 written in Cython. python3-pyjson5.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('serializer', 'Summary(en_US) serializer -> serialize, serializes, serialized') python3-pyjson5.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('serializer', '%description -l en_US serializer -> serialize, serializes, serialized') python3-pyjson5.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings, 3 filtered, 2 badness; has taken 0.2 s Unversioned so-files -------------------- python3-pyjson5: /usr/lib64/python3.14/site-packages/pyjson5/pyjson5.cpython-314-x86_64-linux-gnu.so Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/p/pyjson5/pyjson5-2.0.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 7ccc98586cf87dfeadfa76de8df4c9cb0c3d21d1b559e28812dd9633748d6e25 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7ccc98586cf87dfeadfa76de8df4c9cb0c3d21d1b559e28812dd9633748d6e25 Requires -------- python3-pyjson5 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) python(abi) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- python3-pyjson5: python-pyjson5 python3-pyjson5 python3-pyjson5(x86-64) python3.14-pyjson5 python3.14dist(pyjson5) python3dist(pyjson5) Diff spec file in url and in SRPM --------------------------------- --- /home/fedora-packaging/reviews/python-pyjson5/2402008-python-pyjson5/srpm/python-pyjson5.spec 2026-01-30 09:30:09.748691835 +0300 +++ /home/fedora-packaging/reviews/python-pyjson5/2402008-python-pyjson5/srpm-unpacked/python-pyjson5.spec 2026-01-26 03:00:00.000000000 +0300 @@ -1,2 +1,12 @@ +## START: Set by rpmautospec +## (rpmautospec version 0.8.3) +## RPMAUTOSPEC: autorelease, autochangelog +%define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua: + release_number = 1; + base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}")); + print(release_number + base_release_number - 1); +}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{!?-n:%{?dist}} +## END: Set by rpmautospec + Name: python-pyjson5 Version: 2.0.0 @@ -50,3 +60,6 @@ %changelog -%autochangelog +## START: Generated by rpmautospec +* Mon Jan 26 2026 John Doe <packager> - 2.0.0-1 +- Uncommitted changes +## END: Generated by rpmautospec Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2402008 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Python, Generic, C/C++ Disabled plugins: SugarActivity, Haskell, R, fonts, Java, PHP, Perl, Ocaml Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH Comments: a) Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=141683856 b) Please remove the full stop at the end of the summary c) Approved - fix (b) before import. d) The documentation can be built, but not required see: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=141689491 will attach example spec file e) Review of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2432752 would be appreciated.
Created attachment 2127522 [details] Modified spec file with docs
Thank you, will fix and take that review.
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyjson5
FEDORA-2026-2022d11f81 (python-pyjson5-2.0.0-1.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-2022d11f81
FEDORA-2026-2022d11f81 has been pushed to the Fedora 43 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-2022d11f81 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-2022d11f81 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2026-2022d11f81 (python-pyjson5-2.0.0-1.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.