Bug 2415260 - Review Request: kind - Kubernetes IN Docker - local clusters for testing Kubernetes
Summary: Review Request: kind - Kubernetes IN Docker - local clusters for testing Kube...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Terje Rosten
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-11-16 16:01 UTC by blinxen
Modified: 2025-11-18 20:25 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-11-18 20:25:27 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
terjeros: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description blinxen 2025-11-16 16:01:50 UTC
Spec URL: https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/kind/kind.spec
SRPM URL: https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/kind/kind-0.30.0-1.fc44.src.rpm

Description:
Kubernetes IN Docker - local clusters for testing Kubernetes.

Fedora Account System Username: blinxen

Comment 1 blinxen 2025-11-16 16:01:53 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=138971685

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-16 16:07:44 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9802838
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2415260-kind/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09802838-kind/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Terje Rosten 2025-11-18 11:04:50 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
  Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/licenses/kind
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_duplicate_files

 This is harmless
  
===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
     found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 8331 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
     Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: kind-0.30.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm
          kind-0.30.0-1.fc44.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpstk0wbam')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

kind.src: E: spelling-error ('Kubernetes', "Summary(en_US) Kubernetes -> Cabernet's, Hibernates, Benet's")
kind.src: E: spelling-error ('Kubernetes', "%description -l en_US Kubernetes -> Cabernet's, Hibernates, Benet's")
kind.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('Kubernetes', "Summary(en_US) Kubernetes -> Cabernet's, Hibernates, Benet's")
kind.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('Kubernetes', "%description -l en_US Kubernetes -> Cabernet's, Hibernates, Benet's")
kind.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kind
kind.spec: W: invalid-url Source1: kind-0.30.0-vendor.tar.bz2
kind.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/kind/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/yaml/goyaml.v2/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/kind/images/kindnetd/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/kind/site/static/examples/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/kind/vendor/modules.txt /usr/share/licenses/kind/modules.txt
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/base/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/hack/third_party/gimme/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/kindnetd/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/kindnetd/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/hack/third_party/gimme/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/kindnetd/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/base/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/local-path-provisioner/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/hack/third_party/gimme/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/local-path-provisioner/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/base/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/local-path-provisioner/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/kindnetd/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/site/static/examples/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/site/static/examples/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/kindnetd/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/site/static/logo/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/logo/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/yaml/goyaml.v2/NOTICE /usr/share/licenses/kind/vendor/go.yaml.in/yaml/v3/NOTICE
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 15 warnings, 7 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 0.5 s 

Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: kind-debuginfo-0.30.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpebh00u54')]
checks: 32, packages: 1

 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 5 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.4 s
 
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 2

kind.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/kind /lib64/libresolv.so.2
kind.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('Kubernetes', 'Summary(en_US) Kubernetes -> Rubbernecks')
kind.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('Kubernetes', '%description -l en_US Kubernetes -> Rubbernecks')
kind.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kind
kind.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/kind/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/yaml/goyaml.v2/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/kind/images/kindnetd/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/kind/site/static/examples/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/kind/vendor/modules.txt /usr/share/licenses/kind/modules.txt
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/base/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/hack/third_party/gimme/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/kindnetd/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/kindnetd/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/hack/third_party/gimme/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/kindnetd/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/base/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/local-path-provisioner/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/hack/third_party/gimme/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/local-path-provisioner/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/base/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/local-path-provisioner/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/kindnetd/scripts/third_party/gimme/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/site/static/examples/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/site/static/examples/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/images/kindnetd/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/site/static/logo/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/kind/logo/LICENSE
kind.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/licenses/kind/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/yaml/goyaml.v2/NOTICE /usr/share/licenses/kind/vendor/go.yaml.in/yaml/v3/NOTICE
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 15 warnings, 9 filtered, 2 badness; has taken 0.2 s 


Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kind/archive/v0.30.0/kind-0.30.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : bfaa702786beae1a9958d4d9cdddbdcc94c8ca5f7a5dca3a4a5a748c51477693
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : bfaa702786beae1a9958d4d9cdddbdcc94c8ca5f7a5dca3a4a5a748c51477693

Requires
--------
kind (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    (docker-cli or podman-docker)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libresolv.so.2()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

Provides
--------
kind:
    bundled(golang(al.essio.dev/pkg/shellescape))
    bundled(golang(github.com/BurntSushi/toml))
    bundled(golang(github.com/evanphx/json-patch/v5))
    bundled(golang(github.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap))
    bundled(golang(github.com/kr/text))
    bundled(golang(github.com/mattn/go-isatty))
    bundled(golang(github.com/niemeyer/pretty))
    bundled(golang(github.com/pelletier/go-toml))
    bundled(golang(github.com/pkg/errors))
    bundled(golang(github.com/spf13/cobra))
    bundled(golang(github.com/spf13/pflag))
    bundled(golang(go.yaml.in/yaml/v3))
    bundled(golang(golang.org/x/sys))
    bundled(golang(gopkg.in/check.v1))
    bundled(golang(sigs.k8s.io/yaml))
    kind
    kind(x86-64)
 

 All good,

 package is APPROVED.

Comment 4 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-11-18 20:08:39 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kind

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2025-11-18 20:22:23 UTC
FEDORA-2025-1bb4f887cb (kind-0.30.0-1.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-1bb4f887cb

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2025-11-18 20:25:27 UTC
FEDORA-2025-1bb4f887cb (kind-0.30.0-1.fc44) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.