Spec URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/opkssh/opkssh.spec SRPM URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/opkssh/opkssh-0.12.0-2.fc44.src.rpm Description: OpenPubkey SSH is a tool which enables ssh to be used with OpenID Connect allowing SSH access to be managed via identities like alice instead of long-lived SSH keys. Fedora Account System Username: thofmann
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10047280 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2432005-opkssh/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10047280-opkssh/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - Documentation size is 3302052 bytes in 52 files. Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Spec URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/opkssh/opkssh.spec SRPM URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/opkssh/opkssh-0.12.0-5.fc44.src.rpm
Created attachment 2123249 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 10047280 to 10047349
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10047349 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2432005-opkssh/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10047349-opkssh/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
I might be able to review this as it's probably relevant to us eventually, but I don't know how easily I could test it, and it seems to be a duplicate of 2421125. I'm not sure whether I should mark it as such, which will close it. Perhaps collaborate on that one?
Thanks for volunteering to review and for pointing out the duplicate, I missed it! I put some additional effort into packaging the server-side bits (config, selinux etc.), but I'll check with Mikel whether we should just merge the two. I might be able to set up a simple test environment in a container.
Btw, for testing, the following should work if you have a gmail account: 1. Enable copr: sudo dnf copr enable thofmann/opkssh 2. Install opkssh-server sudo dnf install opkssh-server 3. Enable log in for your user: sudo opkssh add $USER $YOUREMAIL google 4. Log in: opkssh login (Then choose Google, log in, ...) 5. Test ssh: ssh localhost 5a. If you have already set up a different key and so `ssh localhost` would succeed without opkssh, you can also use the following command to enforce the use of opkssh: ssh -i ~/.ssh/id_ecdsa -o IdentitiesOnly=yes localhost where id_ecdsa is the keyfile generated by opkssh (that's usually what it's called, you might want to verify, e.g. by checking timestamps) You can also verify via -v or in the system log that login happens via opkssh.
Dave, I guess you can continue with the package review, if you are still willing to do that. I have not heard back from Mikel yet.
Apologies for the delay. I'll try to look at it next week. If anyone else can be more responsive, feel free!
Spec URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/opkssh/opkssh.spec SRPM URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/opkssh/opkssh-0.13.0-1.fc45.src.rpm Great, thank you! I've updated to the latest release (0.13.0).
Created attachment 2130611 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 10047349 to 10159246
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10159246 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2432005-opkssh/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10159246-opkssh/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
That's a nice project so I belive adding this package to Fedora will be beneficial for many. I'll review it, and Dave, thanks for the reviewing efforts so far.
Actually it's in a good state already. There are lots of rpmlint warning and even errors but all of them can be explained by a special treatment of the package( special group, security parameters, etc). I wouldn't consider them as a blockers, so here is my formal Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/licenses/opkssh See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_duplicate_files ^^^ guess this could be a false positive since all the licensing is done using standard macros. - The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. Note: Not a valid SPDX expression 'Apache-2.0 AND BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause AND ISC AND MIT AND Unlicense'. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1 ^^^ This is definitaly a false positive. ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. ^^^ Generated automatically. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [+/-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec but I don;t believe it's practical in our case. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package owns all directories that it creates. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [+/-]: Package contains bundled libraries as usual for golang ones. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format (%autochangelog). [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [-]: Not a GUI application. [-]: No development files. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: The package is not a rename of another package. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package does not contain systemd file(s). [x]: Useful -debuginfo package. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. ^^^ This is actually a false positive. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages is not necessary. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in opkssh- server , opkssh-server-selinux [?]: I did not test if the package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged (0.13.0). [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Sources werent verified with gpgverify. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). See: (this test has no URL) ^^^ Spec-file was regenerated locally. This is false-positive. [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: opkssh-0.13.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm opkssh-server-0.13.0-1.fc44.noarch.rpm opkssh-server-selinux-0.13.0-1.fc44.noarch.rpm opkssh-doc-0.13.0-1.fc44.noarch.rpm opkssh-0.13.0-1.fc44.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp8lkgn_5p')] checks: 32, packages: 5 opkssh-server-selinux.noarch: W: zero-perms-ghost Suggestion: "%ghost %attr(0644,root,root) /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/opkssh" opkssh-server.noarch: E: useless-provides group(opkssh) ^^^ False positive opkssh.spec: W: specfile-warning warning: Macro expanded in comment on line 34: %{archivename}-vendor.tar.bz2 opkssh.spec: W: specfile-warning warning: /tmp/rpmlint.opkssh-0.13.0-1.fc44.src.rpm.uceq3qjg/opkssh.spec line 87: autopatch: no matching patches in range ^^^ Survivable. opkssh-server.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib opkssh-server.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/opk/auth_id opkssh opkssh-server.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/opk/providers opkssh opkssh-server.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/opk/auth_id 640 opkssh-server.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/opk/providers 640 opkssh-server.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ssh/sshd_config.d/60-opkssh.conf 600 opkssh-server.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/sudoers.d/opkssh 440 opkssh.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary opkssh opkssh.x86_64: W: no-documentation opkssh-server.noarch: W: no-documentation opkssh-server-selinux.noarch: W: no-documentation opkssh.spec:34: W: macro-in-comment %{archivename} opkssh.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/opkssh/vendor/github.com/openpubkey/openpubkey/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/opkssh/LICENSE opkssh.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/opkssh/vendor/modules.txt /usr/share/licenses/opkssh/modules.txt opkssh-server.noarch: W: empty-%pre opkssh-server-selinux.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre cp opkssh-server-selinux.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm opkssh-server-selinux.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%posttrans rm opkssh-server-selinux.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm opkssh-server.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ssh/sshd_config.d/60-opkssh.conf opkssh-server.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sudoers.d/opkssh 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 20 warnings, 139 filtered, 5 badness; has taken 1.8 s Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: opkssh-debuginfo-0.13.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpi_1uyys_')] checks: 32, packages: 1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 5 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 1.0 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- /bin/sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8): No such file or directory /bin/sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8): No such file or directory /bin/sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8): No such file or directory /bin/sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8): No such file or directory ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 5 opkssh-server-selinux.noarch: W: zero-perms-ghost Suggestion: "%ghost %attr(0644,root,root) /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/opkssh" opkssh-server.noarch: E: useless-provides group(opkssh) opkssh.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/opkssh /lib64/libresolv.so.2 opkssh-server-selinux.noarch: W: read-error [Errno 21] Is a directory: '/var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/opkssh' opkssh-server.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib opkssh-server.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/opk/auth_id opkssh opkssh-server.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/opk/providers opkssh opkssh-server.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/opk/auth_id 640 opkssh-server.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/opk/providers 640 opkssh-server.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ssh/sshd_config.d/60-opkssh.conf 600 opkssh-server.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/sudoers.d/opkssh 440 opkssh.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary opkssh opkssh-server-selinux.noarch: W: no-documentation opkssh-server.noarch: W: no-documentation opkssh.x86_64: W: no-documentation opkssh.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/opkssh/vendor/github.com/openpubkey/openpubkey/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/opkssh/LICENSE opkssh.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/opkssh/vendor/modules.txt /usr/share/licenses/opkssh/modules.txt opkssh-server.noarch: W: empty-%pre opkssh-server-selinux.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre cp opkssh-server-selinux.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm opkssh-server-selinux.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%posttrans rm opkssh-server-selinux.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm opkssh-server.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ssh/sshd_config.d/60-opkssh.conf opkssh-server.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sudoers.d/opkssh 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 19 warnings, 141 filtered, 5 badness; has taken 0.7 s Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/openpubkey/opkssh/archive/v0.13.0/opkssh-0.13.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 7b0180c8bda0df15c627a99a105e41f76d421c19a8f7f8f256da7eb2fec991b5 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7b0180c8bda0df15c627a99a105e41f76d421c19a8f7f8f256da7eb2fec991b5 https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/opkssh/opkssh-0.13.0-vendor.tar.bz2 : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 6b281b02341ab230779d376926bbc9b842e6e36fdcc4b37774cda38ac2072109 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 6b281b02341ab230779d376926bbc9b842e6e36fdcc4b37774cda38ac2072109 Requires -------- opkssh (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libresolv.so.2()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) opkssh-server (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (opkssh-server-selinux if selinux-policy-targeted) /bin/sh config(opkssh-server) group(opkssh) opkssh opkssh-server-selinux (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh selinux-policy-targeted opkssh-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- opkssh: bundled(golang(dario.cat/mergo)) bundled(golang(filippo.io/bigmod)) bundled(golang(github.com/Azure/go-ansiterm)) bundled(golang(github.com/Microsoft/go-winio)) bundled(golang(github.com/awnumar/memcall)) bundled(golang(github.com/awnumar/memguard)) bundled(golang(github.com/bmatcuk/doublestar/v4)) bundled(golang(github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v4)) bundled(golang(github.com/containerd/errdefs)) bundled(golang(github.com/containerd/errdefs/pkg)) bundled(golang(github.com/containerd/log)) bundled(golang(github.com/containerd/platforms)) bundled(golang(github.com/cpuguy83/dockercfg)) bundled(golang(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2)) bundled(golang(github.com/davecgh/go-spew)) bundled(golang(github.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v4)) bundled(golang(github.com/distribution/reference)) bundled(golang(github.com/docker/docker)) bundled(golang(github.com/docker/go-connections)) bundled(golang(github.com/docker/go-units)) bundled(golang(github.com/ebitengine/purego)) bundled(golang(github.com/felixge/httpsnoop)) bundled(golang(github.com/go-chi/chi/v5)) bundled(golang(github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4)) bundled(golang(github.com/go-logr/logr)) bundled(golang(github.com/go-logr/stdr)) bundled(golang(github.com/go-ole/go-ole)) bundled(golang(github.com/goccy/go-json)) bundled(golang(github.com/gogo/protobuf)) bundled(golang(github.com/google/uuid)) bundled(golang(github.com/gorilla/securecookie)) bundled(golang(github.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap)) bundled(golang(github.com/jeremija/gosubmit)) bundled(golang(github.com/kballard/go-shellquote)) bundled(golang(github.com/klauspost/compress)) bundled(golang(github.com/kr/fs)) bundled(golang(github.com/lestrrat-go/blackmagic)) bundled(golang(github.com/lestrrat-go/httpcc)) bundled(golang(github.com/lestrrat-go/httprc)) bundled(golang(github.com/lestrrat-go/iter)) bundled(golang(github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v2)) bundled(golang(github.com/lestrrat-go/option)) bundled(golang(github.com/lufia/plan9stats)) bundled(golang(github.com/magiconair/properties)) bundled(golang(github.com/melbahja/goph)) bundled(golang(github.com/moby/docker-image-spec)) bundled(golang(github.com/moby/go-archive)) bundled(golang(github.com/moby/patternmatcher)) bundled(golang(github.com/moby/sys/sequential)) bundled(golang(github.com/moby/sys/user)) bundled(golang(github.com/moby/sys/userns)) bundled(golang(github.com/moby/term)) bundled(golang(github.com/morikuni/aec)) bundled(golang(github.com/muhlemmer/gu)) bundled(golang(github.com/muhlemmer/httpforwarded)) bundled(golang(github.com/opencontainers/go-digest)) bundled(golang(github.com/opencontainers/image-spec)) bundled(golang(github.com/openpubkey/openpubkey)) bundled(golang(github.com/pkg/errors)) bundled(golang(github.com/pkg/sftp)) bundled(golang(github.com/pmezard/go-difflib)) bundled(golang(github.com/power-devops/perfstat)) bundled(golang(github.com/rs/cors)) bundled(golang(github.com/russross/blackfriday/v2)) bundled(golang(github.com/segmentio/asm)) bundled(golang(github.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4)) bundled(golang(github.com/sirupsen/logrus)) bundled(golang(github.com/spf13/afero)) bundled(golang(github.com/spf13/cobra)) bundled(golang(github.com/spf13/pflag)) bundled(golang(github.com/stretchr/testify)) bundled(golang(github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-go)) bundled(golang(github.com/thediveo/enumflag/v2)) bundled(golang(github.com/tklauser/go-sysconf)) bundled(golang(github.com/tklauser/numcpus)) bundled(golang(github.com/yusufpapurcu/wmi)) bundled(golang(github.com/zitadel/logging)) bundled(golang(github.com/zitadel/oidc/v3)) bundled(golang(github.com/zitadel/schema)) bundled(golang(go.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdk)) bundled(golang(go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp)) bundled(golang(go.opentelemetry.io/otel)) bundled(golang(go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace)) bundled(golang(go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric)) bundled(golang(go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace)) bundled(golang(go.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlp)) bundled(golang(golang.org/x/crypto)) bundled(golang(golang.org/x/exp)) bundled(golang(golang.org/x/mod)) bundled(golang(golang.org/x/net)) bundled(golang(golang.org/x/oauth2)) bundled(golang(golang.org/x/sys)) bundled(golang(golang.org/x/term)) bundled(golang(golang.org/x/text)) bundled(golang(gopkg.in/yaml.v3)) opkssh opkssh(x86-64) opkssh-server: config(opkssh-server) group(opkssh) opkssh-server user(opkssh) opkssh-server-selinux: opkssh-server-selinux opkssh-doc: opkssh-doc Diff spec file in url and in SRPM --------------------------------- --- /home/petro/rpmbuild/SPECS/2432005-opkssh/srpm/opkssh.spec 2026-02-28 17:57:10.166634859 +0100 +++ /home/petro/rpmbuild/SPECS/2432005-opkssh/srpm-unpacked/opkssh.spec 2026-02-22 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,2 +1,12 @@ +## START: Set by rpmautospec +## (rpmautospec version 0.8.3) +## RPMAUTOSPEC: autorelease, autochangelog +%define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua: + release_number = 1; + base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}")); + print(release_number + base_release_number - 1); +}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{!?-n:%{?dist}} +## END: Set by rpmautospec + # Generated by go2rpm 1.18.0 %bcond check 1 @@ -149,3 +159,21 @@ %changelog -%autochangelog +## START: Generated by rpmautospec +* Sun Feb 22 2026 Till Hofmann <thofmann> - 0.13.0-1 +- Uncommitted changes + +* Thu Jan 22 2026 Till Hofmann <thofmann> - 0.12.0-5 +- Remove 'opkssh' from summaries + +* Thu Jan 22 2026 Till Hofmann <thofmann> - 0.12.0-4 +- Move docs into separate sub-package + +* Thu Jan 22 2026 Till Hofmann <thofmann> - 0.12.0-3 +- Do not install docs not useful in a package + +* Thu Jan 22 2026 Till Hofmann <thofmann> - 0.12.0-2 +- Drop redundant Provides + +* Thu Jan 22 2026 Till Hofmann <thofmann> - 0.12.0-1 +- Drop golang- prefix from package name +## END: Generated by rpmautospec Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2432005 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Perl, C/C++, Haskell, SugarActivity, PHP, Python, Java, fonts, Ocaml, R Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH This package is ================ === APPROVED === ================
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/opkssh
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-a86646a250 (opkssh-0.13.0-2.el10_3) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.3. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2026-a86646a250
FEDORA-2026-b8f18701cc (opkssh-0.13.0-2.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-b8f18701cc
FEDORA-2026-1d12dbc309 (opkssh-0.13.0-2.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-1d12dbc309
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-a86646a250 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.3 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2026-a86646a250 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
*** Bug 2421125 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Thank you Peter for the review swap and the speedy review!
FEDORA-2026-dcb863468e has been pushed to the Fedora 42 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-dcb863468e \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-dcb863468e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-d8e3c5c5e1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2026-d8e3c5c5e1 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2026-b8f18701cc has been pushed to the Fedora 43 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-b8f18701cc \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-b8f18701cc See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2026-1d12dbc309 has been pushed to the Fedora 44 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-1d12dbc309 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-1d12dbc309 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2026-dcb863468e (opkssh-0.13.0-2.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2026-1d12dbc309 (opkssh-0.13.0-2.fc44) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-a86646a250 (opkssh-0.13.0-2.el10_3) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.3 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-d8e3c5c5e1 (opkssh-0.13.0-2.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2026-b8f18701cc (opkssh-0.13.0-2.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.