Currently, Bugzilla is at: > ~~~ > Name : bugzilla > Epoch : 0 > Version : 5.0.6 > Release : 25.fc43 > Architecture : noarch > Download size : 1.4 MiB > Installed size : 5.6 MiB > Source : bugzilla-5.0.6-25.fc43.src.rpm > Repository : fedora > ~~~ However, 5.2 exists. # Reproducible Always # Steps to Reproduce ~~~sh #!/usr/bin/env sh run0 dnf5 install --refresh -y bugzilla ~~~ # Actual Results `rpm -qi bugzilla` returns: > ~~~ > Version : 5.0.6 > ~~~ # Expected Results It should return âȘ: > ~~~ > Version : 5.2 > ~~~ # Additional Information As https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/why-has-urm-not-created-an-rhbz-bug-to-track-accerciser-3-48-0/178990/3 explains, enabling release monitoring may assist: 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229163#c0 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239786#c0 I care because of what https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/how-to-run-the-bugzilla-package/180539 describes.
(In reply to Mr. Beedell, Roke Julian Lockhart (RJLB) from comment #0) > > However, 5.2 exists. Back when 5.2 was released, there were issues with upgrading from version 5.0.x and I held off on upgrading the package. That said, if those issues aren't solved by now, I think we should bite the bullet and upgrade the package anyways. OTOH, I don't really have time to maintain all my packages and I should probably orphan this package so that it can be picked up by someone who has more time than I do. > As > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/why-has-urm-not-created-an-rhbz-bug- > to-track-accerciser-3-48-0/178990/3 explains, enabling release monitoring > may assist: Historically, release monitoring has never worked well with software that has multiple active branches. Until it does, it's of little help, I believe. > I care because of what > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/how-to-run-the-bugzilla-package/ > 180539 describes. I will add my thoughts there.