Bug 2445448 - Consider using separate lesspipe package
Summary: Consider using separate lesspipe package
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: less
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michal Hlavinka
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-03-07 08:26 UTC by Andreas Haupt
Modified: 2026-03-10 21:42 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-03-10 21:42:02 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Andreas Haupt 2026-03-07 08:26:33 UTC
Dear less packagers,

I'm currently trying to package Wolfgang Friebel's lesspipe package and bringing it into Fedora + EPEL. See this review:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2417806

and copr repo:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ahaupt/lesspipe/

I was made aware, you already want to directly include this lesspipe package:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308285

Some reviewers of #2417806 claimed, keeping less + lesspipe separate would be a better approach. Please consider using (and maybe sponsor) the separate lesspipe package I'm trying to bring into Fedora.

Thanks,
Andreas

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Michal Hlavinka 2026-03-10 21:42:02 UTC
Hi, yes, less has always had a lesspipe script and that's same as what Debian does, because without lesspipe its usage is very limited and it won't be able to open even gziped plain text files or man pages. That's why lesspipe is inseparable part of less, not just optional addon. lesspipe is a small script, so it's not needed to be excluded for saving space on some disk image. It does not pull big dependencies that would affect image size either. So, in summary I do not plan to separate lesspipe from less package.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.