Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mumble07/OpenVSP/fedora-42-x86_64/10203696-OpenVSP/OpenVSP.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mumble07/OpenVSP/srpm-builds/10203696/OpenVSP-3.47.0-1.src.rpm Description: OpenVSP is a parametric aircraft geometry tool. OpenVSP allows the user to create a 3D model of an aircraft defined by common engineering parameters. This model can be processed into formats suitable for engineering analysis. Fedora Account System Username: Mumble07 This will be my first submission, and I will require sponsorship. Assistance would also be appreciated. I am in contact with Rob McDonald, the developer of OpenVSP.
The following built-in dependencies were not packaged into the RPM: * libcartesian.so * libcfd_mesh.so * libgeom_api.so * libgeom_api_g.so * libgeom_core.so * libglfont2.so * libgui_and_draw.so * librobust.so * libsixseries.so * libstb_image.so * libtritri.so * libutil.so * libutil_api.so * libviewerscreens.so * libvsp_graphic.so * libvspaero_lib.so * libwavedragEL.so * libxmlvsp.so The bundled CMake RPM packager correctly included them. Is there a way to fix this in the .spec file?
Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are: - You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description or any of your comments - The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS - The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name specified in the ticket summary --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
(In reply to marc from comment #1) > The following built-in dependencies were not packaged into the RPM: > * libcartesian.so > * libcfd_mesh.so > * libgeom_api.so > * libgeom_api_g.so > * libgeom_core.so > * libglfont2.so > * libgui_and_draw.so > * librobust.so > * libsixseries.so > * libstb_image.so > * libtritri.so > * libutil.so > * libutil_api.so > * libviewerscreens.so > * libvsp_graphic.so > * libvspaero_lib.so > * libwavedragEL.so > * libxmlvsp.so > > The bundled CMake RPM packager correctly included them. Is there a way to > fix this in the .spec file? Fixed, will upload a new .srpm/.spec
(In reply to Fedora Review Service from comment #2) > Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are: > > - You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description > or any of your comments > - The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS > - The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name > specified > in the ticket summary > > > --- > This comment was created by the fedora-review-service > https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service > > If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new > Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mumble07/OpenVSP/fedora-42-x86_64/10203696-OpenVSP/OpenVSP.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mumble07/OpenVSP/srpm-builds/10203696/OpenVSP-3.47.0-1.src.rpm
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10203941 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2445636-openvsp/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10203941-OpenVSP/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
(In reply to Fedora Review Service from comment #5) > Copr build: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10203941 > (failed) > > Build log: > https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora- > review-2445636-openvsp/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10203941-OpenVSP/builder-live. > log.gz > > Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. > > - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network > unavailability), please ignore it. > - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they > are listed in the "Depends On" field > > > --- > This comment was created by the fedora-review-service > https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service > > If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new > Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Rawhide does not appear to have gcc-14. The version of STEPCode in OpenVSP does not compile with gcc-15, and is unlikely to compile with gcc-16 (though I haven't checked). Rawhide compatibility is a bigger ask than f42 and f43 for the moment. Is that workable for now?
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10203972 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2445636-openvsp/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10203972-OpenVSP/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Is it possible to start by packaging one of the dependencies: clipper2 delabella exprparse libIGES OpenABF pinocchio STEPcode triangle
Sure, but not all of them. Some are quite a pain to compile, and/or have documented issues when using them as shared libraries.
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #8) > Is it possible to start by packaging one of the dependencies: > clipper2 > delabella > exprparse > libIGES > OpenABF > pinocchio > STEPcode > triangle Would you like these in a separate bug report, or appended to this one?
SPEC : https://github.com/Mumbri-systems/OpenVSP/blob/fedora-3.47.0/pkg/rpm/OpenVSP.spec SRPM : https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mumble07/OpenVSP/srpm-builds/10209437
(In reply to marc from comment #11) > SPEC : > https://github.com/Mumbri-systems/OpenVSP/blob/fedora-3.47.0/pkg/rpm/OpenVSP. > spec > SRPM : > https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mumble07/OpenVSP/srpm- > builds/10209437 Wrong link https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mumble07/OpenVSP/srpm-builds/10209437/OpenVSP-3.47.0-1.src.rpm
Created attachment 2133111 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 10203972 to 10218154
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10218154 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2445636-openvsp/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10218154-OpenVSP/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - Not a valid SPDX expression 'NASA-1.3'. Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1 Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
New build incorporating the latest version of STEPCode, and passing internal self tests: SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mumble07/OpenVSP/srpm-builds/10282799/OpenVSP-3.47.0-1.src.rpm SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mumble07/OpenVSP/srpm-builds/10282799/OpenVSP.spec When STEPCode is included in repos, I will switch to using system STEPCode (along with other dependencies).
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10284293 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2445636-openvsp/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10284293-OpenVSP/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - Not a valid SPDX expression 'NASA-1.3'. Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1 Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Permanent links: SPEC: https://github.com/Mumbri-systems/OpenVSP/raw/openvsp-fedora/pkg/rpm/OpenVSP.spec SRPM: https://github.com/Mumbri-systems/OpenVSP/releases/download/openvsp_3.49.0-fedora/OpenVSP-3.49.0.20260422git6637418-1.src.rpm Some outstanding issues remain; Eigen is still using version 3. I also noticed Angelscript is available in the repo, but using the system package breaks the build due to addons not being found. I'll look into it.
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10356169 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2445636-openvsp/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10356169-OpenVSP/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - Not a valid SPDX expression 'NASA-1.3'. Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1 Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
New build with system stepcode. The source repo has been shifted to upstream, and all changes are now patches. SRPM: https://mumble07.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/OpenVSP-3.50.3-1.src.rpm SPEC: https://github.com/Mumbri-systems/OpenVSP/raw/openvsp-fedora/pkg/rpm/OpenVSP.spec Known outstanding issues: CPPTest is out of date in fedora repos, and is unusable Bundled libraries have not been removed from the source as per https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling Angelscript requires addons, which are not available in the fedora repos. Guidance would be appreciated.