Description of problem: Firefox receive signal SIGSEGV when I'm trying to search for the word "dot", it crashes after "do". Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): firefox-1.5.0.10-2.el5 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to affected page (protected by kerberos login). 2. CTRL+f and enter "do". Actual results: Firefox crashes. Expected results: Firefox find the content with "do" expression. Additional info: I'll attach backtrace to this bug as soon as possible.
Need to be able to reproduce. Do you have a URL?
Taking bug, marek sits in the same office as me.
Created attachment 160113 [details] same bug with firefox-2.0.0.5-3
Upstream bug is here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386819
Behdad, could you please check this firefox-1.5-pango-underline.patch?
the proposed patch looks not good to me. it may fixes this issue but it will introduces other issue on other place. actually "start" and "end" expects pointing to the start position and the end position and it has to be a positive value. So something else is still wrong...
Eh, I'm not sure if the usage of unsigned types can ensure the positive values :) Anyway, feel free to fix the firefox-1.5-pango-underline.patch as you want....
Sorry for taking a long time. After some investigations, the negative values was likely to appear without any pango patches in our package. since I haven't touched the core logic around it, Martin's patch looks correct then. Thanks Martin for the patch and sorry for false alarm.
aha, okay, I'll update the current patch then. thanks.
Removing Securiy keyword; I see no security implications. In case you aware of any, please let me know.
*** Bug 334161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0979.html