Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Spec URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-abol-codegen.spec SRPM URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-abol-0.1.0-1.fc45.src.rpm Description: A high-performance, asynchronous, dictionary-driven RADIUS framework Fedora Account System Username: asn
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10406338 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2463819-rust-abol/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10406338-rust-abol/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Spec URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-abol-codegen.spec SRPM URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-abol-0.1.0-2.fc45.src.rpm Added LICENSE files and README.md
Looks like you linked the wrong .spec file here?
Spec URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-abol.spec SRPM URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-abol-0.1.0-2.fc45.src.rpm
Thanks, the links work now. I see one minor issue and one medium-sized blocker: Looks like you copy-pasted the rust2rpm.config from other abol-* crates to this one, but it's actually not necessary here: This top-level crate already includes all the files that are separately included (LICENSE, LICENSE-APACHE, README.md). Just drop the rust2rpm.toml config for additional source files, doc-files / license-files overrides, and scripts.prep.pre. It looks like this crate also includes some unused (?) files that are not covered by the MIT / Apache-2.0 license under dictionaries/* - these all have CC-BY-4.0 license headers. If they are indeed unused (I see no references to them in "abol-0.1.0" crate sources), you either need to "rm" those files in %prep (i.e. `rm -vr dictionaries/`) or exclude them from packaged crates (i.e. add something like `%exclude %{crate_instdir}/dictionaries/` to the %files list for the -devel subpackage). Settings for both are available in rust2rpm.toml (scripts.prep.post or package.exclude-crate-files).
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10666287 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2463819-rust-abol/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10666287-rust-abol/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Spec URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-abol.spec SRPM URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-abol-0.1.0-4.fc45.src.rpm
Created attachment 2147247 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 10666287 to 10667358
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10667358 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2463819-rust-abol/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10667358-rust-abol/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review. It looks like running the tests would require enabling the "tokio" feature. This would be a nice-to-have, but doesn't block the review. You could do this with the following rust2rpm.toml snippet: ``` [features] enable = ["tokio"] ``` ✅ package contains only permissible content ✅ package builds and installs without errors on rawhide 🫤 test suite is run and all unit tests pass: No tests are run. ✅ latest version of the crate is packaged ✅ license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora ✅ license files are included with %license in %files ✅ package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines Package APPROVED. === Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks: - set up package on release-monitoring.org: project: $crate homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate backend: crates.io version scheme: semantic version filter (*NOT* pre-release filter): alpha;beta;rc;pre distro: Fedora Package: rust-$crate - set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-abol Monitoring: Wasn't able to create project in Anitya. You can create it manually on: `https://release-monitoring.org`
FEDORA-2026-6536e9130a (rust-abol-0.1.0-1.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-6536e9130a
FEDORA-2026-6536e9130a (rust-abol-0.1.0-1.fc45) has been pushed to the Fedora 45 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.