Bug 24691 - ssh host -l user <command> doesn't execute the command
ssh host -l user <command> doesn't execute the command
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 24293
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: openssh (Show other bugs)
7.1
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nalin Dahyabhai
Florence RC-1
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2001-01-23 09:06 EST by David Lawrence
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-01-23 13:21:25 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Derek Tattersall 2001-01-23 09:06:17 EST
Transcript of session:
[dlt@sundown dlt]$ ssh test90.test -l dlt ls
dlt@test90.test's password: 
[dlt@sundown dlt]$

The same thing works with rsh.
Comment 1 Glen Foster 2001-01-23 12:44:07 EST
This defect is considered MUST-FIX for Florence Release-Candidate #1
Comment 2 Nalin Dahyabhai 2001-01-23 13:08:10 EST
Does this also happen using the "user@hostname" variation?  When you use a
command like "touch /tmp/foo", does the file get created?
Comment 3 Derek Tattersall 2001-01-23 13:21:21 EST
Yes, happens with either way of specifying the user and host.  It appears that
the file foo gets created, so the command gets executed but the output never
comes back.
Comment 4 Nalin Dahyabhai 2001-01-23 13:58:38 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24293 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.