Spec URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/SPEC/compizconfig-python.spec SRPM URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/compizconfig-python/compizconfig-python-0.0.1-0.5.20070708git.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Compiz Project brings 3D desktop visual effects that improve usability of the X Window System and provide increased productivity though plugins and themes contributed by the community giving a rich desktop experience. This package contains bindings to configure Compiz's plugins and the composite window manager. --- BuildReq libcompizconfig - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247406
Added block dependency
I've updated the package to 0.6.0 branch SRPM: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/compizconfig-python/compizconfig-python-0.6.0-1.c4e49d.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/compizconfig-python/compizconfig-python.spec
(removing NEEDSPONSOR)
bug 247406 closed today's update: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/compizconfig-python/compizconfig-python-0.6.0-0.2.20071018git0e80b1.fc8.src.rpm
Well, although F8 freeze has already come, I hope ccsm (and then also this package) can be included before F8 is released. My comments for 0.6.0-0.2.XXXXXX * Seemingly too long name - rpmlint complains that the name of binary rpms are too long. -------------------------------------------------------------- $ rpmlint *rpm compizconfig-python.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.0-2.20071018git0e80b1 0.6.0-0.2.20071018git0e80b1.fc8 compizconfig-python-debuginfo.i386: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet compizconfig-python-debuginfo-0.6.0-0.2.20071018git0e80b1.fc8.i386.rpm compizconfig-python-devel.i386: W: no-documentation compizconfig-python-devel.i386: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet compizconfig-python-devel-0.6.0-0.2.20071018git0e80b1.fc8.i386.rpm $ rpmlint -I filename-too-long-for-joliet filename-too-long-for-joliet : This filename is too long to fit on a joliet filesystem (limit is 64 unicode chars). -------------------------------------------------------------- Please consider to shorten the rpms' name. * .pc file - Is this .pc file (and then -devel subpackage) really needed? * -devel package does not contain any libraries or header files * This file does not seem to be used to rebuild ccsm. ! COPYING - Well, the source codes are actually under LGPLv2+, however COPYING file is GPL. The license tag can be LGPLv2+, however please ask the developer to change COPYING file (this is not a blocker).
// * .pc file - Is this .pc file (and then -devel subpackage) really needed? * -devel package does not contain any libraries or header files * This file does not seem to be used to rebuild ccsm. // ure right, the .pc file is not needed anymore (it was needed by the configure script before, thats where that BuildDep came from) so, should I merge this file with the main package?
Simply removing .pc file is better.
the .pc file might be used by some other softwares to detect the existence of compizconfig-python .. (like what ccsm done before) .. hurm .. so, just ignore that for now and add later in case somebody filed a bug?? ..
s/"in case"/"after"/
IMO if some package needs compizconfig-python, then the package should check by python -c "import compizconfig" for example, not by this useless .pc file.
Ok, done http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/compizconfig-python/compizconfig-python-0.6.0-0.3.20071018git.fc8.src.rpm
Okay to me.
errr .. (noobie question) am i supposed to set the fedora-review flag to + myself??? ..
(In reply to comment #13) > errr .. (noobie question) am i supposed to set the fedora-review flag to + > myself??? .. You should not do that. I can reassign this bug to myself, however I want to wait what Ignacio says one more day before doing it.
-------------------------------------------------------------- This package (compizconfig-python) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Perhaps F-8 branch will be created soon, so when you request CVS branch, please also request to create F-8 branch. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg01515.html
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compizconfig-python Short Description: Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System Owners: izhar Branches: F-8 Devel InitialCC: izhar Cvsextras Commits: yes
cvs done.
Closing for now.
Hi Mohd Izhar, Is it ok for me to request a epel6 branch? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677365 Thanks Leigh
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: compizconfig-python New Branches: el6 Owners: leigh123linux
Git done (by process-git-requests).