+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #240913 +++ Description of problem: Only part of the received message is shown on failed GPG verification. Received mail from a correspondent not having his key on the keyservers, and only fragments of his message is shown in evolution. Full message shown on reply etc however. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): evolution-2.8.3-2.fc6 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open such message 2. 3. Actual results: Only part of the message displayed Expected results: Complete email message displayed, Additional info: Fedora code 6 x86_64 running in sv_SE.UTF-8 locale. Think problem appeared after last yum update (update about once/mont). Can't remember seeing it before, but it's not very often I get gpg signatures from unknown keys.. -- Additional comment from henrik on 2007-05-22 16:17 EST -- Created an attachment (id=155198) Two messages where this problem is seen -- Additional comment from danieldk on 2007-06-17 17:35 EST -- This problem also occurs with Evolution in EL5. CentOS bug report reference: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2148 -- Additional comment from mcrha on 2007-06-20 13:37 EST -- Moving this upstream [1] and sent a patch there too. Thanks for your assistance. [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449531
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.
Fixed in evolution-2.12.1-4.el5.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0361.html