Bug 2487101 - Review Request: rust-tls_codec - A pure Rust implementation of the TLS (de)serialization
Summary: Review Request: rust-tls_codec - A pure Rust implementation of the TLS (de)se...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ben Beasley
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://crates.io/crates/tls_codec
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2487074
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-06-09 18:02 UTC by Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Modified: 2026-07-17 20:16 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-07-17 20:16:53 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
code: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2026-06-09 18:02:34 UTC
Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-tls_codec/rust-tls_codec.spec
SRPM URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-tls_codec/rust-tls_codec-0.4.2-1.fc45.src.rpm
Description:
This crate implements the TLS codec as defined in RFC 8446 as well as some extensions required by MLS.

Fedora Account System Username: rathann

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2026-06-09 18:05:07 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10583991
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2487101-rust-tls_codec/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10583991-rust-tls_codec/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Ben Beasley 2026-06-14 06:52:15 UTC
The package is APPROVED, but please add documentation for the metadata patch when you import it, as suggested below:

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

The spec file is generated by rust2rpm, simplifying the review.

Please document what tls_codec-fix-metadata.diff is doing and why (and the
upstream status of these changes, if applicable). Something like this in
rust2rpm.toml will cover it:

  [package]
  cargo-toml-patch-comments = [
      "Remove benchmark-only dev-dependency on criterion",
  ]


Issues:
=======
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
  Note: warning: File listed twice:
  /usr/share/cargo/registry/tls_codec-0.4.2/CHANGELOG.md
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_duplicate_files

  OK: not a serious problem; due to reasonable rust2rpm design decisions.


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0",
     "MIT License". 17 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/ben/fedora/review/2487101-rust-
     tls_codec/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries
     with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
     tls_codec-devel , rust-tls_codec+default-devel , rust-
     tls_codec+arbitrary-devel , rust-
     tls_codec+conditional_deserialization-devel , rust-tls_codec+derive-
     devel , rust-tls_codec+mls-devel , rust-tls_codec+serde-devel , rust-
     tls_codec+std-devel , rust-tls_codec+tls_codec_derive-devel
[x]: Package functions as described.

     (tests pass)

[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.

     Please document tls_codec-fix-metadata.diff.

[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
     Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
     attached diff).
     See: (this test has no URL)
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: rust-tls_codec-devel-0.4.2-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-tls_codec+default-devel-0.4.2-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-tls_codec+arbitrary-devel-0.4.2-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-tls_codec+conditional_deserialization-devel-0.4.2-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-tls_codec+derive-devel-0.4.2-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-tls_codec+mls-devel-0.4.2-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-tls_codec+serde-devel-0.4.2-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-tls_codec+std-devel-0.4.2-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-tls_codec+tls_codec_derive-devel-0.4.2-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-tls_codec-0.4.2-1.fc45.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpik0wsaoc')]
checks: 32, packages: 10

 10 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 55 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.8 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.9.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.15/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 9

 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 51 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/tls_codec/0.4.2/download#/tls_codec-0.4.2.crate :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 0de2e01245e2bb89d6f05801c564fa27624dbd7b1846859876c7dad82e90bf6b
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 0de2e01245e2bb89d6f05801c564fa27624dbd7b1846859876c7dad82e90bf6b


Requires
--------
rust-tls_codec-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    (crate(zeroize) >= 1.8.0 with crate(zeroize) < 2.0.0~)
    (crate(zeroize/alloc) >= 1.8.0 with crate(zeroize/alloc) < 2.0.0~)
    (crate(zeroize/zeroize_derive) >= 1.8.0 with crate(zeroize/zeroize_derive) < 2.0.0~)
    cargo
    rust

rust-tls_codec+default-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo
    crate(tls_codec)
    crate(tls_codec/std)

rust-tls_codec+arbitrary-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    (crate(arbitrary/default) >= 1.4.0 with crate(arbitrary/default) < 2.0.0~)
    (crate(arbitrary/derive) >= 1.4.0 with crate(arbitrary/derive) < 2.0.0~)
    cargo
    crate(tls_codec)
    crate(tls_codec/std)

rust-tls_codec+conditional_deserialization-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo
    crate(tls_codec)
    crate(tls_codec/derive)
    crate(tls_codec_derive/conditional_deserialization)
    crate(tls_codec_derive/default)

rust-tls_codec+derive-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo
    crate(tls_codec)
    crate(tls_codec/tls_codec_derive)

rust-tls_codec+mls-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo
    crate(tls_codec)

rust-tls_codec+serde-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    (crate(serde/default) >= 1.0.184 with crate(serde/default) < 2.0.0~)
    (crate(serde/derive) >= 1.0.184 with crate(serde/derive) < 2.0.0~)
    cargo
    crate(tls_codec)
    crate(tls_codec/std)

rust-tls_codec+std-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo
    crate(tls_codec)
    crate(tls_codec_derive/default)
    crate(tls_codec_derive/std)

rust-tls_codec+tls_codec_derive-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo
    crate(tls_codec)
    crate(tls_codec_derive/default)



Provides
--------
rust-tls_codec-devel:
    crate(tls_codec)
    rust-tls_codec-devel

rust-tls_codec+default-devel:
    crate(tls_codec/default)
    rust-tls_codec+default-devel

rust-tls_codec+arbitrary-devel:
    crate(tls_codec/arbitrary)
    rust-tls_codec+arbitrary-devel

rust-tls_codec+conditional_deserialization-devel:
    crate(tls_codec/conditional_deserialization)
    rust-tls_codec+conditional_deserialization-devel

rust-tls_codec+derive-devel:
    crate(tls_codec/derive)
    rust-tls_codec+derive-devel

rust-tls_codec+mls-devel:
    crate(tls_codec/mls)
    rust-tls_codec+mls-devel

rust-tls_codec+serde-devel:
    crate(tls_codec/serde)
    rust-tls_codec+serde-devel

rust-tls_codec+std-devel:
    crate(tls_codec/std)
    rust-tls_codec+std-devel

rust-tls_codec+tls_codec_derive-devel:
    crate(tls_codec/tls_codec_derive)
    rust-tls_codec+tls_codec_derive-devel



Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
---------------------------------
--- /home/ben/fedora/review/2487101-rust-tls_codec/srpm/rust-tls_codec.spec	2026-06-14 07:25:43.532712598 +0100
+++ /home/ben/fedora/review/2487101-rust-tls_codec/srpm-unpacked/rust-tls_codec.spec	2026-06-07 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,2 +1,12 @@
+## START: Set by rpmautospec
+## (rpmautospec version 0.8.4)
+## RPMAUTOSPEC: autorelease, autochangelog
+%define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua:
+    release_number = 1;
+    base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}"));
+    print(release_number + base_release_number - 1);
+}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{!?-n:%{?dist}}
+## END: Set by rpmautospec
+
 # Generated by rust2rpm 28
 %bcond check 1
@@ -154,3 +164,7 @@
 
 %changelog
-%autochangelog
+## START: Generated by rpmautospec
+* Sun Jun 07 2026 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik> - 0.4.2-1
+- initial package
+- drop unused criterion dev dependency
+## END: Generated by rpmautospec


Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -L tls_codec-deps/ -b 2487101
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: fonts, Java, Python, Haskell, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, PHP, R, C/C++
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Built with local dependencies:
    /home/ben/fedora/review/tls_codec-deps/rust-tls_codec_derive+conditional_deserialization-devel-0.4.2-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
    /home/ben/fedora/review/tls_codec-deps/rust-tls_codec_derive+default-devel-0.4.2-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
    /home/ben/fedora/review/tls_codec-deps/rust-tls_codec_derive-devel-0.4.2-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
    /home/ben/fedora/review/tls_codec-deps/rust-tls_codec_derive+std-devel-0.4.2-1.fc45.noarch.rpm

Comment 3 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-07-17 18:00:46 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-tls_codec
Monitoring:
Wasn't able to create project in Anitya. You can create it manually on: `https://release-monitoring.org`

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2026-07-17 20:14:44 UTC
FEDORA-2026-9fc2d08460 (rust-tls_codec-0.4.2-1.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-9fc2d08460

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2026-07-17 20:16:53 UTC
FEDORA-2026-9fc2d08460 (rust-tls_codec-0.4.2-1.fc45) has been pushed to the Fedora 45 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.