Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 248996
Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync
Last modified: 2009-08-31 17:30:08 EDT
Spec URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync-plugin-synce.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync-plugin-synce-0.22-2.src.rpm Description: Synce plugin for libopensync
Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs. + source files match upstream. f325b7dd9f273c46e77fb7b337325880 libopensync-plugin-synce-0.22.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. - dist tag is NOT present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + shared libraries scriptlet used. + Provides: synce_plugin.so + Requires(interp): /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig + Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libglib-2.0.so.0 libopensync.so.0 librapi.so.2 librra.so.0 libsynce.so.0 libxml2.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH) +Not a GUI App. APPROVED.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libopensync-plugin-synce Short Description: Synce plugin for libopensync Owners: andreas.bierfert@lowlatency.de Branches: FC-6 F-7
The changelog says: - add obsoletes as discussed in #244917 but it looks like you forgot the actual Obsoletes.
Ups... now that you say that +) I will add them after import. Thanks for pointing it out.
any progress? Can this be closed now?
It has been pushed already.
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libopensync-plugin-synce New Branches: F-10 Owners: awjb
CVS done (although I'm confused as to how this ended up with F-9 and F-11 branches but no F-10 branch).
Because F10 shipped with the libopensync 0.3x development version. There are plans to revert everything to 0.22 because the 0.3x versions are just broken.