Bug 2493366 - Review Request: bazel-remote - A remote cache for Bazel
Summary: Review Request: bazel-remote - A remote cache for Bazel
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Andreas Schneider
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-06-26 08:29 UTC by Łukasz Patron
Modified: 2026-08-07 01:36 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-08-07 01:14:20 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
asn: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10652495 to 10652528 (460 bytes, patch)
2026-06-26 09:36 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10652528 to 10656507 (946 bytes, patch)
2026-06-28 03:50 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Łukasz Patron 2026-06-26 08:29:20 UTC
Spec URL: https://luk1337.fedorapeople.org/review/bazel-remote.spec
SRPM URL: https://luk1337.fedorapeople.org/review/bazel-remote-2.6.1-1.fc44.src.rpm
Description: A remote cache for Bazel
Fedora Account System Username: luk1337

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2026-06-26 09:17:26 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10652495
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2493366-bazel-remote/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10652495-bazel-remote/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Łukasz Patron 2026-06-26 09:31:05 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2026-06-26 09:36:51 UTC
Created attachment 2146728 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10652495 to 10652528

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2026-06-26 09:36:53 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10652528
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2493366-bazel-remote/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10652528-bazel-remote/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Łukasz Patron 2026-06-27 11:18:00 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2026-06-28 03:50:47 UTC
Created attachment 2146919 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10652528 to 10656507

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2026-06-28 03:50:49 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10656507
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2493366-bazel-remote/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10656507-bazel-remote/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 8 Andreas Schneider 2026-07-28 09:59:23 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed
     output of licensecheck in
     /home/asn/workspace/pkg/fedora/REVIEW/2493366-bazel-
     remote/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries
     with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 39937 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
     Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
     Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
     attached diff).
     See: (this test has no URL)
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: bazel-remote-2.6.1-1.fc45.x86_64.rpm
          bazel-remote-2.6.1-1.fc45.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpz584fsvx')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

bazel-remote.src: E: spelling-error ('gRPC', '%description -l en_US gRPC -> grep, grip, Kroc')
bazel-remote.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bazel-remote
bazel-remote.spec: W: invalid-url Source1: bazel-remote-2.6.1-vendor.tar.bz2
bazel-remote.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/bazel-remote/vendor/go.yaml.in/yaml/v2/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/bazel-remote/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/bazel-remote/vendor/github.com/mostynb/zstdpool-syncpool/LICENSE
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings, 142 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 1.0 s 




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: bazel-remote-debuginfo-2.6.1-1.fc45.x86_64.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpz8jmejxc')]
checks: 32, packages: 1

 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 5 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.6 s 





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.9.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.15/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 2

bazel-remote.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bazel-remote
bazel-remote.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/bazel-remote/vendor/go.yaml.in/yaml/v2/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/bazel-remote/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/bazel-remote/vendor/github.com/mostynb/zstdpool-syncpool/LICENSE
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 143 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.3 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/buchgr/bazel-remote/archive/v2.6.1/bazel-remote-2.6.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 7e554caa4c9c7033459acc053ee8470208012223e72c81aabe2b48fb0e6c3fbc
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7e554caa4c9c7033459acc053ee8470208012223e72c81aabe2b48fb0e6c3fbc


Requires
--------
bazel-remote (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libresolv.so.2()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
bazel-remote:
    bazel-remote
    bazel-remote(x86-64)
    bundled(golang(cloud.google.com/go/compute/metadata))
    bundled(golang(cloud.google.com/go/longrunning))
    bundled(golang(github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azcore))
    bundled(golang(github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity))
    bundled(golang(github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/internal))
    bundled(golang(github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/storage/azblob))
    bundled(golang(github.com/Azure/go-ntlmssp))
    bundled(golang(github.com/AzureAD/microsoft-authentication-library-for-go))
    bundled(golang(github.com/abbot/go-http-auth))
    bundled(golang(github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go))
    bundled(golang(github.com/beorn7/perks))
    bundled(golang(github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2))
    bundled(golang(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2))
    bundled(golang(github.com/djherbis/atime))
    bundled(golang(github.com/dustin/go-humanize))
    bundled(golang(github.com/go-asn1-ber/asn1-ber))
    bundled(golang(github.com/go-ini/ini))
    bundled(golang(github.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3))
    bundled(golang(github.com/goccy/go-json))
    bundled(golang(github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5))
    bundled(golang(github.com/golang/snappy))
    bundled(golang(github.com/google/go-cmp))
    bundled(golang(github.com/google/uuid))
    bundled(golang(github.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-prometheus))
    bundled(golang(github.com/johannesboyne/gofakes3))
    bundled(golang(github.com/klauspost/compress))
    bundled(golang(github.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2))
    bundled(golang(github.com/kylelemons/godebug))
    bundled(golang(github.com/minio/crc64nvme))
    bundled(golang(github.com/minio/md5-simd))
    bundled(golang(github.com/minio/minio-go/v7))
    bundled(golang(github.com/mostynb/go-grpc-compression))
    bundled(golang(github.com/mostynb/zstdpool-syncpool))
    bundled(golang(github.com/munnerz/goautoneg))
    bundled(golang(github.com/philhofer/fwd))
    bundled(golang(github.com/pkg/browser))
    bundled(golang(github.com/prometheus/client_golang))
    bundled(golang(github.com/prometheus/client_model))
    bundled(golang(github.com/prometheus/common))
    bundled(golang(github.com/prometheus/procfs))
    bundled(golang(github.com/rs/xid))
    bundled(golang(github.com/russross/blackfriday/v2))
    bundled(golang(github.com/ryszard/goskiplist))
    bundled(golang(github.com/shabbyrobe/gocovmerge))
    bundled(golang(github.com/slok/go-http-metrics))
    bundled(golang(github.com/tinylib/msgp))
    bundled(golang(github.com/urfave/cli/v2))
    bundled(golang(github.com/valyala/gozstd))
    bundled(golang(github.com/xrash/smetrics))
    bundled(golang(go.yaml.in/yaml/v2))
    bundled(golang(golang.org/x/crypto))
    bundled(golang(golang.org/x/net))
    bundled(golang(golang.org/x/oauth2))
    bundled(golang(golang.org/x/sync))
    bundled(golang(golang.org/x/sys))
    bundled(golang(golang.org/x/text))
    bundled(golang(golang.org/x/tools))
    bundled(golang(google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api))
    bundled(golang(google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/bytestream))
    bundled(golang(google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc))
    bundled(golang(google.golang.org/grpc))
    bundled(golang(google.golang.org/protobuf))
    bundled(golang(gopkg.in/yaml.v3))

Comment 9 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-07-28 12:07:50 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bazel-remote
Monitoring:
Anitya project is accessible by this link 
`https://release-monitoring.org/project/390907`
 you can modify it manually.
Package wasn't created in Anitya, reason: `Bad Request, some necessary arguments were not provided.`.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2026-07-28 13:09:52 UTC
FEDORA-2026-c3af398165 (bazel-remote-2.6.2-2.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-c3af398165

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2026-07-28 13:10:03 UTC
FEDORA-2026-6cb171c4d4 (bazel-remote-2.6.2-2.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-6cb171c4d4

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2026-07-29 01:49:14 UTC
FEDORA-2026-c3af398165 has been pushed to the Fedora 44 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-c3af398165 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-c3af398165

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2026-07-29 02:06:22 UTC
FEDORA-2026-6cb171c4d4 has been pushed to the Fedora 43 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-6cb171c4d4 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-6cb171c4d4

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2026-07-30 01:45:42 UTC
FEDORA-2026-6cb171c4d4 has been pushed to the Fedora 43 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-6cb171c4d4 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-6cb171c4d4

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2026-07-30 02:00:20 UTC
FEDORA-2026-c3af398165 has been pushed to the Fedora 44 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-c3af398165 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-c3af398165

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2026-08-07 01:14:20 UTC
FEDORA-2026-c3af398165 (bazel-remote-2.6.2-3.fc44) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2026-08-07 01:36:38 UTC
FEDORA-2026-6cb171c4d4 (bazel-remote-2.6.2-3.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.