Bug 25219 – nslookup from bind-utils9.0.1-3 segfaults

Bug 25219 - nslookup from bind-utils9.0.1-3 segfaults

Summary:	nslookup from bind-utils9.0.1-3 segfaults

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 25437

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	bind (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.1
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
QA Contact:	David Lawrence
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	Florence RC-2
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2001-01-29 15:34 EST by David Lawrence
Modified:	2007-04-18 12:30 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-02-02 21:03:37 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Derek Tattersall 2001-01-29 15:34:32 EST

nslookup segfaults when executed as :
nslookup <name-to-look-up> <server-to-look-up-in>

Comment 1 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2001-01-29 16:12:11 EST

Works perfectly here. Please list the IP and name server you were trying to 
resolve.

Comment 2 Glen Foster 2001-01-29 19:03:35 EST

This defect is considered MUST-FIX for Florence Release-Candidate #2

Comment 3 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2001-01-30 15:56:24 EST

Please provide the required info rather than just changing the state from 
NEEDINFO to something else.
I can't reproduce this problem.

Comment 4 Derek Tattersall 2001-01-30 16:31:52 EST

I was testing bind-8.2.3 yesterday and had set up a slave server to hank in the
test lab.  I used the next machine which had bind-utils-9 installed and did
nslookup server1.netpath.net test178.test.redhat.com.  nslookup from bind-9
segfaulted every time, where nslookup from bind-8.2.3 in the same situation
worked perfectly.  Email me separately to get me set up the slave server on
test178.

Comment 5 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2001-02-06 13:13:55 EST


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25437 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.