Bug 28602 – reboot of computer fails

Bug 28602 - reboot of computer fails

Summary:	reboot of computer fails

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 26444

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	kernel (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.1
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Arjan van de Ven
QA Contact:	Brock Organ
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2001-02-21 08:07 EST by Michael Redinger
Modified:	2007-04-18 12:31 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-02-21 17:12:45 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Michael Redinger 2001-02-21 08:07:53 EST

When rebooting (halt works fine) a Compaq Workstation AP200, right
before restart the monitor looses the signal, the computer stops.
Have to press the power button, ctrl-alt-del doesn't work either here.

This worked fine in beta3. Might be related to #23322 (this problem is
resolved in beta4).

Comment 1 Arjan van de Ven 2001-02-21 08:44:04 EST

Can you try the lilo / append option "apm=realmode"?
that should restore the beta3 behavior

Comment 2 Michael Redinger 2001-02-21 17:12:40 EST

No, that doesn't help. I' almost sure this worked in B3 (you say it should work.
Therefore I'm feeling somewhat unsure; I tested B3 on that computer some days -
dont't think I didn't try a reboot, only halts, that would be very untypical for
me - I hardly ever use halt)- should I grab the B3 copy and try it again? Just
in case ...

Comment 3 Arjan van de Ven 2001-03-21 13:26:02 EST

Could you try the suggestions for the kernel options as mentioned
on bug 26444? This looks like a duplicate of that.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26444 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.