Bug 305551 - Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes
Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bill Nottingham
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: ArtworkSplit
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-09-25 17:07 UTC by Ray Strode [halfline]
Modified: 2014-03-17 03:08 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-10-11 15:39:51 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
notting: fedora-review+
notting: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ray Strode [halfline] 2007-09-25 17:07:50 UTC
Spec URL:
http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-gtk-themes/checkout/bluecurve-gtk-themes.spec

SRPM URL:
http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-gtk-themes/checkout/bluecurve-gtk-themes-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm

Description:
This package contains a collection of GTK+ themes that use the bluecurve engine.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2007-09-25 20:33:23 UTC
MUST items:
 - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK
 - Spec file matches base package name. - OK
 - Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK
 - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK
 - License - OK
 - License field in spec matches - ***

Without any supporting information, the license tag should be 'GPL+'. If
something was added to the gtkrc files, I suppose it could be changed to a
different versions.

Then again, I wonder if gtkrc files are even enough of a work to be copyrightable.

 - License file included in package - OK
 - Spec in American English - OK
 - Spec is legible. - ***

There's a duplicated comment.

 - Sources match upstream md5sum: - N/A - no upstream yet
 - Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A
 - BuildRequires correct - OK
 - Spec handles locales/find_lang - OK
 - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK
 - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK
 - Package has correct buildroot -OK
 - Package is code or permissible content. - OK
 - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK

 - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK
 - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK
 - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK
 - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK
 - No rpmlint output. - ***

bluecurve-gtk-themes.src: W: invalid-license GPL 

See above.

bluecurve-gtk-themes.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/bluecurve-gtk-themes-1.0.0/ChangeLog
bluecurve-gtk-themes.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/bluecurve-gtk-themes-1.0.0/NEWS
bluecurve-gtk-themes.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/bluecurve-gtk-themes-1.0.0/README

Can remove.

bluecurve-gtk-themes.noarch: E: description-line-too-long This package contains
a collection of GTK+ themes that use the bluecurve engine.

You could word wrap this.

 - final provides and requires are sane: - ***

Could probably remove the explicit gtk2 require since the engine will pull it in
, but... shrug.

SHOULD Items:

 - Should build in mock. - OK
 - Should build on all supported archs - OK
 - Should function as described. - seems to work
 - Should have dist tag - OK

Fix the license tag, mainly.

Comment 2 Ray Strode [halfline] 2007-09-25 20:48:22 UTC
license tag fixed and duplicate comment removed.

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2007-09-25 20:56:18 UTC
Approved.

Comment 4 Ray Strode [halfline] 2007-09-30 17:39:57 UTC
This now has the engine (which was previously covered by bug 305491) rolled into it.

Comment 5 Ray Strode [halfline] 2007-10-09 15:59:56 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: bluecurve-gtk-themes
Short Description: Bluecurve GTK+ themes
Owners: rstrode,davidz
Branches:
InitialCC:
Cvsextras Commits: no

Comment 6 Bill Nottingham 2007-10-09 21:32:06 UTC
done


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.