Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 305621
Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme
Last modified: 2007-11-30 17:12:16 EST
This package contains the Bluecurve metacity theme, a modernization of
the Bluecurve classic theme, that was shipped in late versions of
Red Hat Linux and early versions of Fedora Core.
[mclasen@localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint
bluecurve-metacity-theme.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL
package name: ok
spec file name: ok
packaging guidelines: ok
license field: invalid
license file: ok
spec file language: AE
spec file readability: excellent
upstream sources: no upstream yet
shared libs: n/a
directory ownership: who is supposed to own
/usr/share/themes/Bluecurve in the new regime ?
macro use: consistent
large docs: n/a
static libs: n/a
pc files: n/a
shared libs: n/a
devel package: n/a
libtool archives: ok
gui apps: n/a
directory ownership: see above
utf8 filenames: ok
%description is misleading, since we are to this day shipping Bluecurve.
fixed. I'm going to need to do another one
to cover the directory ownership (and old the meta theme file). It fell through
the cracks when I did the split up.
but then you need to make this package require bluecurve-gnome-theme ?
i don't know, aside from the dir ownership issue, it makes more sense for
bluecurve-gnome-theme to require bluecurve-metacity-theme, not the other way
So I talked to Matthias about this a bit today. The consensus is we'll have all
the theme packages own /usr/share/themes/Bluecurve.
We think that's probably better than a circular dependency or
New Package CVS Request
Package Name: bluecurve-metacity-theme
Short Description: Bluecurve Metacity theme
Cvsextras Commits: no