Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-qt-engine/checkout/bluecurve-metacity-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-qt-engine/checkout/bluecurve-metacity-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the bluecurve engine for qt.
URLS wrong, how bout: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-qt-engine/checkout/bluecurve-qt-engine.spec http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-qt-engine/checkout/bluecurve-qt-engine-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm
woops, thanks for catching that.
rpmlint output: [mclasen@localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/bluecurve-qt-engine-*.rpm bluecurve-qt-engine.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL bluecurve-qt-engine.src: W: invalid-license LGPL bluecurve-qt-engine-debuginfo.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: invalid license file: ok spec language: AE spec readability: excellent upstream sources: no upstream yet buildability: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: configure looks for KDE headers, so needs to BR kdebase-devel locales: ok shared libs: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: /usr/lib/gt-3.3/plugins/styles is owned by redhat-artwork-kde, so you should probably require that. Ir is that going to be cut into pieces, too ? %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok
changed license to LGPLv2, added build requires I don't think redhat-artwork-kde should own that directory--qt should, yea?
Is the BR kdebase-devel actually needed here? I think it isn't, it's needed only for the KWin theme, which isn't part of this package.
the configure script complains if it is not there...
Filed bug 309091 for the qt issue
Approved
we're going to merge this one into bluecurve-kde-theme