Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 306471
Please add alpha to redhat-lsb
Last modified: 2010-12-05 02:14:46 EST
I attached a patch. Please have a look at it. It might not be the preferred way to do it. :-)
Created attachment 206541 [details] Patch to add alpha to redhat-lsb specfile
Thanks for the patch. The following information suppose to comes from the LSB DB. I will need to have a look at their DB if the information for alpha is supported. If not, I can add in manually with the patch supplied. Have you tried on an alpha? +%ifarch alpha +# archLSB Alpha Base Libraries +Requires: libz.so.1 +Requires: libutil.so.1.1 +Requires: libpthread.so.0 +Requires: libncurses.so.5 +Requires: libm.so.6.1 +Requires: libgcc_s.so.1 +Requires: libdl.so.2.1 +Requires: libcrypt.so.1.1 +Requires: libc.so.6.1 +Requires: libstdc++.so.6 +%endif
I didn't have a look at the lsb db. If lsb db says something else, please do change it accordingly. And yes, that's tested already: [oliver@gosa alpha]$ rpm -q redhat-lsb redhat-lsb-3.1-18.fc8axp And: http://buildsys.zero42.at/koji/buildinfo?buildID=11010
*ping*
*** Bug 248094 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
ping
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported during the development of Fedora 8. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are changing the version of this bug to '8'. If this bug still exists in rawhide, please change the version back to rawhide. (If you're unable to change the bug's version, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help and we apologize for the interruption. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
ping ping ping!
Sorry. Reassigning to hliu to include the patch.
Oliver, Hi, I've queried the LSB DB, arch Alpha is not supported yet. But thank you for the patch, I'll add the patch to the repository, but not merge into the source package right now.
hi, Oliver, The latest version of package is redhat-lsb-3.1-22.
Diff against 3.1-22: Index: redhat-lsb.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/devel/redhat-lsb/redhat-lsb.spec,v retrieving revision 1.38 diff -u -p -r1.38 redhat-lsb.spec --- redhat-lsb.spec 7 Aug 2008 08:46:31 -0000 1.38 +++ redhat-lsb.spec 11 Aug 2008 10:34:20 -0000 @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ %define lsbldso ld-lsb-x86-64.so %endif +%ifarch alpha +%define ldso ld-linux-alpha.so.2 +%define lsbldso ld-lsb-alpha.so +%endif + %ifarch ia64 ppc64 s390x x86_64 %define qual ()(64bit) %else @@ -82,12 +87,15 @@ Provides: lsb = %{version} %ifarch x86_64 %define archname amd64 %endif +%ifarch alpha +%define archname alpha +%endif Provides: lsb-core-%{archname} = %{version} Provides: lsb-graphics-%{archname} = %{version} Provides: lsb-core-noarch = %{version} Provides: lsb-graphics-noarch = %{version} -ExclusiveArch: i386 ia64 x86_64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x +ExclusiveArch: i386 ia64 x86_64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x alpha %ifarch %{ix86} # archLSB IA32 Base Libraries @@ -187,16 +195,34 @@ Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) Requires: libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) %endif +%ifarch alpha +# archLSB Alpha Base Libraries +Requires: libz.so.1 +Requires: libutil.so.1.1 +Requires: libpthread.so.0 +Requires: libncurses.so.5 +Requires: libm.so.6.1 +Requires: libgcc_s.so.1 +Requires: libdl.so.2.1 +Requires: libcrypt.so.1.1 +Requires: libc.so.6.1 +Requires: libstdc++.so.6 +%endif + # gLSB Base/Utility/Stdc++/Graphics Libraries Requires: libz.so.1%{qual} +%ifnarch alpha Requires: libutil.so.1%{qual} +%endif Requires: librt.so.1%{qual} Requires: libpthread.so.0%{qual} Requires: libpam.so.0%{qual} Requires: libncurses.so.5%{qual} Requires: libgcc_s.so.1%{qual} +%ifnarch alpha Requires: libdl.so.2%{qual} Requires: libcrypt.so.1%{qual} +%endif Requires: libstdc++.so.6%{qual} Requires: libXt.so.6%{qual} Requires: libXi.so.6%{qual}
Oliver, Thank you for your new patch. I've included it in the repository. The patch will not be applied to the source until LSB supports Arch Alpha.
I wonder they don't support it yet. However. I hope they will soon :-)
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Can you ping LSB?
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle. Changing version to '12'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '12'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.