Spec URL: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/python-alsa.spec SRPM URL: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/python-alsa- 1.0.15-0.1.rc2.fc7.src.rpm Description: Python binding for the ALSA library. There is native binding to ALSA is developed by ALSA team.
1)Good to add test directory to %doc 2) Also, I think good to use only LGPLv2 as __init__.py lacks copyright code. whereas I have seen few packages installed on my system which have copyright in __init__.py evenif its empty code.
1. I was thinking about it. And I almost agree with you. 2. __init__.py is quite empty. I think the License tag should derived from the real code. Anyway, I'll write to Jaroslav about this misspelling (and I save License tag while now). New SRPMS: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/python-alsa-1.0.15- 0.2.rc2.fc7.src.rpm
you miss to add following line to %prep chmod -x test/*
(In reply to comment #3) Oh, my mistake, sorry. Now fixed. Updated SRPM: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/python-alsa-1.0.15- 0.3.rc2.fc7.src.rpm
Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 3f3153bf5f4d5627655dbbbd71537f1e pyalsa-1.0.15rc2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Package python-alsa-1.0.15-0.3.rc2.fc8 -> Provides: alsacard.so alsacontrol.so alsahcontrol.so alsamixer.so Requires: libasound.so.2 libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9) libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.3) libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libpthread.so.0 libpython2.5.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED.
Thank you for review.
heh. How can this review request be completed? Don't you want to build package? create CVS module? I wonder howcome this package will appear in CVS/rawhide? Please check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess . Next you have to do "CVSAdminProcedure".
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-alsa Short Description: Python binding for the ALSA library Owners: andriy Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes
cvs done.
(In reply to comment #7) Real closed request ticket. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=193050
python-alsa-1.0.14-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-alsa'
python-alsa-1.0.14-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-alsa New Branches: EL-5