kita (or one of its subpacakges) has multiarch conflicts when installed for both i386 and x86_64 in the Fedora development tree. For help in resolving them, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks. file /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kita/index.cache.bz2 from install of kita-0.177.3-11.fc8.1 conflicts with file from package kita-0.177.3-11.fc8.1 (Note that this is an automated bug filing.) It would be nice to have these bugs fixed by the beta of Fedora 9.
This should really be solved in some way, even if it's just changing how the package is organized.
Ask KDE. You can see many KDE apps are blocked by these types of conflicts. Please show us the solution first.
Why does the cache differ across arches? What is the format of the cache file?
(In reply to comment #3) > Why does the cache differ across arches? For now I can only say "I don't know...". I know this is created by ---------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/bin/meinproc --check --cache index.cache.bz2 ./index.docbook ---------------------------------------------------------------- which is very common for KDE apps. Here index.docbook is in tarball, so actually meinproc does something. > What is the format of the cache file? This is bzip2-ed file of normal text (when I investigated). But even after I bunzip2-ed the cache file, the original texts actually differ. This contains very long lines and currently I cannot find out where they differ.