Bug 365661 - TAHI--DHCPv6--The returned status code of the recieved DHCPv6 Advertise Message is not NoAddrsAvail
Summary: TAHI--DHCPv6--The returned status code of the recieved DHCPv6 Advertise Messa...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: dhcpv6
Version: 5.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
urgent
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: David Cantrell
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 365611 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 253764 455723
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-11-04 08:05 UTC by Zhiyong Wu
Modified: 2009-01-20 21:38 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 21:38:18 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:0165 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE dhcpv6 bug fix update 2009-01-20 16:05:26 UTC

Description Zhiyong Wu 2007-11-04 08:05:15 UTC
Description of problem:

  When having dhcpv6 tests about "Advertise message transmission with Status 

Code Option, NoAddrAvail" in the server mode,we found that the returned status 

code of the recieved DHCPv6 Advertise Message is not NoAddrsAvail.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

  kernel-2.6.18-43.el5

Software Environment:   
  Testee(NUT):   
    RHEL5 
    Kernel:2.6.18-43.el5 
   
  Tester(TN):   
    FreeBSD6.2
    v6eval-3.0.12.tar.gz
   
TAHI package:    
  DHCPv6_Self_Test_P2_1_0_7.tar.gz

How reproducible:
  every time

Steps to Reproduce:    
  1. Configure TAHI test environment.     
  2. Run the TAHI test suite     
  3. After the test completes, check for the results 
  
Actual results:

   The returned status code of the recieved DHCPv6 Advertise Message is not 

NoAddrsAvail.

Expected results:

   The returned status code of the recieved DHCPv6 Advertise Message should be 

NoAddrsAvail.

Additional info:
  
   please refer to
 
http://focus.brisbane.redhat.com/~zwu/dhcp_server/20071101/DHCPv6_Self_Test_P2_
1_0_7_server/rfc3315/index.html

   (1) 29 Part D : Advertise message transmission with Status Code Option, 
NoAddrAvail

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2007-11-07 10:24:31 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 2 Zhiyong Wu 2007-12-28 06:44:35 UTC
also about status code,

Additional info:
  
   please refer to

http://focus.brisbane.redhat.com/~zwu/RHEL5.1-Server-20071017.0/20071225/DHCPv6_Self_Test_P2_1_0_8_server/rfc3315/index.html

   (1) 59	Part C : Reception of Release message with invalid IA_NA Identifier

   (2) 62	Part C : Reception of Decline message with invalid IA_NA Identifier


Comment 3 David Cantrell 2008-01-16 04:08:39 UTC
Fixed upstream and will be in dhcpv6-1.0.5.

Comment 4 David Cantrell 2008-01-16 04:13:32 UTC
*** Bug 365611 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 Denise Dumas 2008-06-06 13:42:01 UTC
This works when there is only one IA_NA but fails for multiple IA_NA options.
Known issue, OK for DoD cert.

Comment 12 Red Hat Bugzilla 2008-07-08 01:24:24 UTC
Adding yshao to the cc list as the manager of the disabled user zwu who reported this bug

Comment 13 David Cantrell 2008-07-15 23:13:17 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 439526 ***

Comment 14 David Cantrell 2008-07-15 23:29:30 UTC
A fix for this issue should be in dhcpv6-1.0.10-6.el5 and later builds.

Comment 22 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 21:38:18 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0165.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.