Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 38791 - Software RAID won't autorun
Software RAID won't autorun
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
alpha Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Ingo Molnar
Brock Organ
: 40586 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2001-05-02 14:10 EDT by Chris Adams
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:32 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2001-06-04 16:10:14 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch to fs/partitions/osf.c to enable RAID autorun (1.12 KB, patch)
2001-05-02 14:11 EDT, Chris Adams
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Chris Adams 2001-05-02 14:10:59 EDT
Software RAID does not autorun on any platform that doesn't use MSDOS style
partition tables because the only partition type in fs/partitions that
calls md_autodetect_dev() is msdos.c.

I'm attaching a patch that should make RAID autorun work on OSF partitions
(although I cannot test it yet, since the installer crashes on me - bug
#38790).  Ideally, the add_gd_partition() function would be like the
add_partition() function in 2.2, where the partition type was passed in (or
just 0 if partitions didn't have types) and add_gd_partition would then
have the logic to call md_autodetect_dev().
Comment 1 Chris Adams 2001-05-02 14:11:35 EDT
Created attachment 17068 [details]
Patch to fs/partitions/osf.c to enable RAID autorun
Comment 2 Arjan van de Ven 2001-05-02 15:38:29 EDT
Ingo: can you take a peek at this?
Comment 3 Chris Adams 2001-05-24 14:16:00 EDT
One other (possibly obvious) comment on this, especially since the release notes
with RC1 suggest software RAID: compile the RAID modules in to the default
kernel.  The above patch is useless without that.
Comment 4 Phil Copeland 2001-06-04 16:00:02 EDT
Ingo? Arjan? anybody?
The above patch is not in the current cvs, is this a patch that we want? reject
or apply?

Comment 5 Phil Copeland 2001-06-04 16:10:10 EDT
*** Bug 40586 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.