Bug 395561 - [kn_IN] ra + halant + ra is not rendering properly
Summary: [kn_IN] ra + halant + ra is not rendering properly
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: fonts-indic
Version: 5.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Rahul Bhalerao
QA Contact: QE Internationalization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 395531
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-11-22 11:37 UTC by Rahul Bhalerao
Modified: 2010-10-18 16:57 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-04-02 07:55:19 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Rahul Bhalerao 2007-11-22 11:37:41 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #395531 +++

Description of problem:
Following combination have problem with 'ra' shape in below base.
Please check one example for #27, and other are at
http://batman.brisbane.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTestCaseGSUB-Kannada.html

#197- U+0CB0 U+0CCD U+0CB0  ರ್ರ  RA + HALANT + RA

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Tested with fonts-kannada-2.1.5-2.fc8


How reproducible:
Everytime

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Get into Kannada locale
2.Open any writer and activate SCIM
3.key-in jdj(iniscript) and see the output (ರ್ರ)
  
Actual results:
As in attached image

Expected results:
As in attached image

Additional info:

-- Additional comment from svenkate@redhat.com on 2007-11-22 06:11 EST --
Created an attachment (id=266671)
Acrual and expected results
Comment 2 Rahul Bhalerao 2008-04-02 07:55:19 UTC 
This bug cannot be completely fixed in fonts due to limitations in the opentype
layout engines. Also if the below base form of Ra is required to be used in
Ra+Halant+RA kind of combination, it can be currently obtained with the use of
ZWJ as Ra+ZWJ+Halant+Ra. Thus this bug is not worth fixing in font.
Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2008-06-17 07:21:13 UTC 
Okay thanks - unproposing and reversing devel ack.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.