Bug 41860 - kdeadmin won't rebuild
Summary: kdeadmin won't rebuild
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification: Retired
Component: kdeadmin
Version: 1.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
QA Contact: Aaron Brown
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2001-05-22 17:26 UTC by Vladimir Kondratiev
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:33 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-05-22 17:26:59 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Vladimir Kondratiev 2001-05-22 17:26:55 UTC
Description of Problem:
When I try to build kdeadmin from src rpm, it won't build.
I was suggested to rebuild from source in order to work around bug 41859
(kpackage and gnorpm do not work)

How Reproducible: 
Always

Steps to Rrproduce:
1. rpm --rebuild kdeadmin-2.2-0.alpha1.1.src.rpm

Actual Results:
(last few lines)
checking for Qt... libraries /usr/lib/qt-2.3.0/lib
checking if Qt compiles without flags... no
checking for moc... /usr/bin/moc
checking for rpath... yes
checking for bool... yes
configure: error: can only configure for one host and one target at a time
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21007 (%build)

Expected Results:

Additional Information:
All packages are from RawHide distribution.
rawhide-release-20010515-1.rpm

Comment 1 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2001-05-22 17:41:42 UTC
0.alpha2.1 works here.



Comment 2 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2001-05-22 17:42:07 UTC
Chances are you're using a broken autoconf, make sure you're using 2.13.


Comment 3 Vladimir Kondratiev 2001-05-23 06:44:43 UTC
tho notes:
1. there is no 0.alpha2.1 for kdeadmin. there is kdeadmin-2.2-0.alpha1.1.src.rpm
2. on rawhide, there is autoconf-2.14.9-2.src.rpm. Do you mean this version is
broken? Should I get previous version from, say, rh7.1?


Comment 4 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2001-05-23 06:57:15 UTC
1. It is in the tree that will be rawhide the next time someone decides to 
push it to ftp (and no, I can't do that)
2. Yes. 2.14.9 was an attempt to see if it breaks things or if it works 
better. We've decided the former is the case and reverted it.



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.