Bug 426496 - autofs fails to mount nfs4 when client and server are same machine
Summary: autofs fails to mount nfs4 when client and server are same machine
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: autofs5
Version: 4.6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ian Kent
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: Regression
Depends On: 253625
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-12-21 15:45 UTC by Ian Kent
Modified: 2008-07-24 19:09 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 2008-07-24 19:09:39 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2008:0659 normal SHIPPED_LIVE autofs5 bug fix and enhancement update 2008-07-23 14:54:24 UTC

Comment 1 RHEL Product and Program Management 2007-12-21 15:46:29 UTC
This bugzilla has Keywords: Regression.  

Since no regressions are allowed between releases, 
it is also being proposed as a blocker for this release.  

Please resolve ASAP.

Comment 2 Barry Donahue 2008-02-18 21:08:06 UTC
Manual test in comment #0.

Comment 3 Jeff Moyer 2008-02-18 21:18:20 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Manual test in comment #0.

Actually, this is covered by /CoreOS/autofs/bugzillas subtest bz253625.  I know,
we're making your job way too easy, right?

Comment 4 Ian Kent 2008-02-19 03:01:41 UTC
My records indicate that test /CoreOS/autofs/bugzillas, subtest
bz235625 covers this case.

Comment 5 Ian Kent 2008-03-13 03:53:39 UTC
This issue is fixed in autofs5-5.0.1-0.rc2.87.



Comment 7 Barry Donahue 2008-06-12 15:41:01 UTC
Verified RHTS job #23575

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2008-07-24 19:09:39 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0659.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.