http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mkdst.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mkdst-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Source repository and tarball release tool Currently supports only bzr, but more VCS tools are planned.
The only nitpick I can find is that the first line of %description isn't grammatically a sentence. But honestly, there's nothing worth complaining about. * source files match upstream: 6ea7d6db3fd86b2dc3eaf6c00012ebf5fd0fe81963b10e51d3b45d9578aa1629 mkdst-0.1.tar.bz2 (downloaded manually since there is no permanent location yet) * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64. * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: mkdst = 0.1-1.fc9 = /bin/sh * %check is not present; no test suite upstream * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED