Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 428717
Package Review of virt-viewer 0.0.2 requested
Last modified: 2008-09-15 05:10:30 EDT
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
Created attachment 291620 [details]
Proposed virt-viewer RPM
Original Fedora review notes
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM.
+ source files match upstream.
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc files present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets are used.
+ Requires: libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libdl.so.2
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0
libgnutls.so.13 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-vnc-1.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libvirt.so.0 libxenstore.so.3.0
+ Not a GUI app.
No significant changes since the Fedora review.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in
the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like
this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your
support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?".
Moving to RHEL-ACCEPT based on comment 3
the RHEL5.2 release notes will be dropped to translation on April 15, 2008, at
which point no further additions or revisions will be entertained.
a mockup of the RHEL5.2 release notes can be viewed at the following link:
please use the aforementioned link to verify if your bugzilla is already in the
release notes (if it needs to be). each item in the release notes contains a
link to its original bug; as such, you can search through the release notes by
No idea why this BZ was still open when it was shipped long ago.