* rpmlint output:
> sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/sectool/scheduler/scheduler.py 0644
> sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/actions.py 0644
> sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/sectool/scheduler/__init__.py 0644
> sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/scheduler/i18n.py 0644
> sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/output.py 0644
> sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/__init__.py 0644
> sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/tuierrors.py 0644
> sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/sectool/scheduler/errors.py 0644
Need fixing (by removing the #!... line)
> sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/sectool/scheduler/selftest.py 0644
Needs fixing (make it executable, or don't ship it)
> sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/share/sectool/tests/netserv.sh 0744
> sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/share/sectool/tests/home_dirs.sh 0744
> sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/share/sectool/tests/selftest.sh 0744
> sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/share/sectool/tests/disc_usage.sh 0744
> sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/share/sectool/tests/suid.py 0744
> sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sectool/sectool.py 0744
> sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/share/sectool/tests/path.sh 0744
> sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/share/sectool/tests/home_files.sh 0744
> sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/share/sectool/tests/passwd.sh 0744
Need fixing - use 0755
> sectool.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/sectool
/usr/share/sectool/sectool.py
Fixing this is not quite necessary IMHO, but it can't hurt.
> sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/share/sectool/tests/python_defs.py 0744
Needs fixing - use 0644
> sectool.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0 0.1.0-1.fc8
Use "0.1.0-1" in the %changelog version number
> sectool.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm
> sectool.noarch: W: bogus-variable-use-in-%post $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Definitely needs fixing:
* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is no longer relevant in %post
* Why does that script remove the .py[co] files anyway?

> sectool-gui.noarch: W: no-documentation
OK
> sectool-gui.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/etc/security/console.apps/sectool-gui
> sectool-gui.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /etc/pam.d/sectool-gui
These files should not be executable.
> sectool-gui.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/guiOutput.py 0644
> sectool-gui.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/guiRender.py 0644
Remove the #!... line.
> sectool-gui.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/share/sectool/sectool-gui.py 0744
Use 0755
> sectool-gui.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode
Needs fixing
> sectool-gui.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-description extention extension
Needs fixing

* The source0: URL does not point to the tarball, the real URL is
https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/sectool/attachment/wiki/WikiStart/sectool-0.1.0.tar.bz2?format=raw
  Perhaps use only "%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2" and put the full URL in a
  comment.
FIXME: source0: content in this case
* The uploaded tarball does not match the tarball in src.rpm!!
* License: GPL+ is probably correct, but do you _want_ it to be GPL+?
  (RH copyright guidelines say something else)
* ExclusiveOS: useless, just drop it
* Two source0 lines!
* sectool-gui should probably Requires: sectool = %{version}-%{release}
* Requires: gtk2 - You probably want pygtk2.
* desktop file: "HardwareSettings" isn't true
* Drop the (cat %{name}.lang)
* Add "%doc README:
* Use one of the recommended BuildRoot: values
* sectool.desktop should be shipped in sectool-gui
* sectool.desktop: Remove .png from Icon=
* Add --vendor=fedora to desktop-file-install
* A %defattr directive is missing in %files gui

* URL: perhaps use https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/sectool/wiki/WikiStart to
  avoid a certificate mismatch warning
* Consider using macros for paths; at least you can
  (make PREFIX=%{_prefix} ...and so on for other variables),
  perhaps add more variables to the Makefile to remove other hard-coded
  directory paths like /etc, /usr/bin and /var/lib/sectool and /usr/share
* Can you use (make %{?_smp_mflags}) ?
* %description: s/inerface/interface
* %description gui: To me this reads like "sectool provides a GUI";
  perhaps just "sectool-gui provides a GTK-based graphical user interface to
  sectool."?

sectool seems to be a fairly popular name for a tool, judging by google. Not
that I have a better one.

For example, http://sectool.sourceforge.net/,
http://sectool-db.sourceforge.net/, https://sectool.dev.java.net/.

Update!
Spec URL:
http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/sectool/sectool.spec

SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/sectool/sectool-0.1.0-2.fc7.src.rpm

Note, I didn't update web pages(wiki). If new rpm pass review, I'll do that. I 
hope it will be much better now, rpmlint is quite.

* rpmlint output:
> sectool-gui.noarch: W: no-documentation
OK

* License: The field was changed to GPLv2+, but the code still does not contain
  copyright notices specifying the intended license.  The License: field might
  be sufficient - but just to be sure, please add a copyright header to each
  source file, per the RH copyright guidelines

* macros:
> Consider using macros for paths; at least you can
> (make PREFIX=%{_prefix} ...and so on for other variables),
> perhaps add more variables to the Makefile to remove other hard-coded
> directory paths like /etc, /usr/bin and /var/lib/sectool and /usr/share
-2 is not an improvement in this regard: macros are used in %files and
hard-coded paths in the Makefile: if the macro values change, the build will 
break.  For each path, either use a hard-coded path both in the Makefile and the
spec, or use a macro in the spec and pass the macro value to the Makefile somehow.

(If you decide this isn't worth it and revert to using hard-coded paths, I won't
protest.)


> Note, I didn't update web pages(wiki). If new rpm pass review, I'll do that.
OK.  (In the future, please don't change released tarballs like this - it might
become quite a mess if different distributions use different tarballs with the
same version number.)

Update!
Spec URL:
http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/sectool/sectool.spec

SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/sectool/sectool-0.1.0-3.fc7.src.rpm

- license issues are fixed
- macros have been improved. For each macro in spec file is equivalent
Makefile macro. However spec file macros are not passed to Makefile. I don't 
expect that there will be any changes soon and if it happends there is easy 
fix. Lots of similar packages do it same way.

-3 doesn't build on f8:
> + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
> /var/tmp/sectool-0.1.0-root/usr/share/sectool/sectool.py:               
action="store", metavar="CONFIG",
default="/var/tmp/sectool-0.1.0-root/etc/sectool.conf",
> Found '/var/tmp/sectool-0.1.0-root' in installed files; aborting

At least these lines are incorrect:
>         sed -i
's,default=\".*\",default=\"$(DESTDIR)${SYSCONFDIR}/sectool\.conf\",'
$(DESTDIR)$(PKGDATADIR)/sectool.py
>         sed -i
's,scheduler\.SecToolConf(\".*\"),scheduler\.SecToolConf(\"$(DESTDIR)${SYSCONFDIR}/sectool\.conf\"),'
$(DESTDIR)$(PKGDATADIR)/sectool-gui.py

DESTDIR is "install under this root", not "at run-time, all files will be under
this prefix". 

fixed.

Spec URL:
http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/sectool/sectool.spec

SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/sectool/sectool-0.1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm

> SRPM URL:
> http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/sectool/sectool-0.1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm

Approved, UNDER THE CONDITION that sectool-0.1.0.tar.bz2 in the package and on
the wiki will match.  (And in the future, please don't ever change either of the
tarballs without incrementing a version number.)

(In reply to comment #10)
> > SRPM URL:
> > http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/sectool/sectool-0.1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm
> 
> Approved, UNDER THE CONDITION that sectool-0.1.0.tar.bz2 in the package and 
on
> the wiki will match.
done

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: sectool
Short Description: - A security audit system and intrusion detection system
Owners: pvrabec
Branches:
InitialCC:
Cvsextras Commits: yes

cvs done.