Bug 429901 - [te_IN] upon joined character the halant was not rendering properly in te-IN
Summary: [te_IN] upon joined character the halant was not rendering properly in te-IN
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: lohit-fonts
Version: 9
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Rahul Bhalerao
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 400891
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-01-23 18:29 UTC by Rahul Bhalerao
Modified: 2009-01-26 22:29 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-09-11 04:43:34 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Rahul Bhalerao 2008-01-23 18:29:39 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #400891 +++

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Gedit 2.16.0

How reproducible:
maintain SCIM in RAWCODE.And provide the code se

Steps to Reproduce:
1.open Gedit 2.16.0
2.Maintain SCIM in RAWCODE.
3.And give the follwing code sequences 0c38+0c4d+0c1f+oc4d

  
Actual results:

స్ట్  

Expected results:

will give in the attachement.

Additional info:

-- Additional comment from kkrothap on 2007-11-27 07:52 EST --
Created an attachment (id=269701)
html file.


-- Additional comment from kkrothap on 2007-11-27 07:59 EST --
Created an attachment (id=269711)
te-IN redering problem.

Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 04:51:24 UTC
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 2 Tony Fu 2008-09-10 03:10:14 UTC
requested by Jens Petersen (#27995)

Comment 3 Rahul Bhalerao 2008-09-11 04:43:34 UTC
The duplicate bug has been already closed as NOTABUG.

Comment 4 Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-26 22:29:41 UTC
Using ZWJ as in bug 451203 for the combination "U+0c2f U+0c4d U+0c30 U+0c4d", pango uses the character sequence "U+0c2f U+0c4d U+0c30 U+0c4d U+200d" as is instead of the reordered sequence "U+0c2f U+0c30 U+0c4d U+0c4d." With the former sequence the glyphs added are "U+0c2f+halanth below-base-U+0c30 U+200d" whereas with the latter we get "U+0c2f below-base-U+0c30 U+0c4d" followed by substitution of below-base-U+0c30 with a wider glyph due to the context of U+0c2f. Now the rendering of "U+0c2f wide-below-base-U+0c30 U+0c4d" can be fixed as suggested in bug 476427 to get "U+0c2f+halanth wide-below-base-U+0c30" which isn't possible with ZWJ.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.