Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 product line. The current stable release is 5.10. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 431564

Summary: Unhandled exemption when installing via NFS
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: John Carroll-Gavula <john.carrollgavula>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.1   
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-04-18 16:10:53 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Exemption report none

Description John Carroll-Gavula 2008-02-05 14:48:22 UTC 
Description of problem:
Booting from a RHEL5 boot iso, installing OS via NFS.  After dependencies have been validated 
anaconda reports an unhandled exemption.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot from boot iso
2. Choose NFS as install option
3. Select default configs, and tell anaconda to install
  
Actual results:
Unhandled exemption

Expected results:
Install the OS

Additional info:
Comment 1 Chris Lumens 2008-02-05 15:03:00 UTC 
*** Bug 431565 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Chris Lumens 2008-02-05 15:03:54 UTC 
Please attach the exception log to this bug report.
Comment 3 John Carroll-Gavula 2008-02-05 15:10:37 UTC 
Created attachment 294001 [details]
Exemption report
Comment 4 Joel Andres Granados 2008-04-18 16:10:53 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 224088 ***