Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib-3.5.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ocaml-sexplib-3.5.0-1.fc9.src.rpm ocaml-sexplib.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions See bug 434690 $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ocaml-sexplib-3.5.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm ocaml-sexplib.i386: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions ocaml-sexplib.i386: E: no-binary ocaml-sexplib.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib See bug 433783 $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ocaml-sexplib-devel-3.5.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm ocaml-sexplib-devel.i386: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions
Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib-3.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm * Wed Apr 23 2008 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones> - 3.7.1-1 - New upstream version 3.7.1. - Fixed upstream URL. - Depend on latest type-conv.
Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib-3.7.4-1.fc9.src.rpm * Sat May 3 2008 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones> - 3.7.4-1 - New upstream version 3.7.4.
Looks like ocaml-type-conv 1.5 is stuck in limbo. Maybe when rawhide becomes rawhide again.
Well, crap, I hadn't intended to assign this to me but I got it confused with another bug. I'll build the new ocaml-type-conf from CVS so that I can review this.
Drat, it fails to build: sh: camlp4orf: command not found I added a build dependency on ocaml-camlp4-devel and things build OK. I'll assume it's there for the purposes of this review. There seems to be some sort of test suite in lib_test. As far as I can tell, it gets built but it doesn't run. Is there any way to run it? The main package includes a .cmo file; does it need to be there? * source files match upstream: 9e9ddef96daba4eba5377e74d3e1d75ebce976645269796043b7a2b1d3ad83cf sexplib310-3.7.4.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: ocaml-sexplib-3.7.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm ocaml(Pa_sexp_conv) = 81cb23e0f8dbe36dd669271f8d73f2a0 ocaml(Sexplib) = b2231946fa2832e7a14946e5809093da ocaml-sexplib = 3.7.4-1.fc9 = ocaml(Arg) = 03e86a4154064ea900dc32c05f53e364 ocaml(Array) = aa8e3cd5824f9bb40b93fcd38d0c95b5 ocaml(Bigarray) = e881a834bafaaa24bc612d94119cc0f5 ocaml(Big_int) = 992d682669507b99e689b5a2188c0b9a ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3 ocaml(Camlp4) = 1e46a133b8062d1571640f7fa36f32c4 ocaml(Camlp4_config) = cb716b4361f43326c6ad695c7a1bb5c0 ocaml(Camlp4_import) = 0134ca95282ef6821081c0c11802cea0 ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1 ocaml(Complex) = bb333e8e4cda78107ccf27048ca40492 ocaml(Filename) = 633a1e7f590ff5e95124293dbef3b476 ocaml(Format) = 35fe566f7a37d8991a5c822bd1463949 ocaml(Hashtbl) = 083f2c94b44ff4e0b3220aaea6a783b4 ocaml(Int32) = 711321870c949bd3bbdd092d9bae92e4 ocaml(Int64) = f8f7e2e4c0667ead94596040b12e732d ocaml(Lazy) = 8a4b5e7f0bdc6316df9264fd73cde981 ocaml(Lexing) = b1793496643444d3762dd42bebe2cfe3 ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Nat) = 0ea20dd1cc4533fd519b5542a89feb87 ocaml(Nativeint) = e79cdc4d3575c2ed044955cb7ef49aca ocaml(Num) = cfa2705c9c6d6f5a56b83f91fc630d2a ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Parsing) = 62cca107e4e88af303516459a87c3e9a ocaml(Pa_type_conv) = 432cfbcca727c79fd9a65c602aa4eb34 ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(Printexc) = 82717999a586ede6925c0aa18d6562ac ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341 ocaml(Queue) = caa3a209bfc63d23a30f573541a88fec ocaml(Ratio) = 7067125cce206dd2bbe93918ba7bdfe9 ocaml(Set) = 7da14e671a035f12386ace3890018ef3 ocaml(Stream) = 21a833e12efd34ea0c87d8d9da959809 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(Sys) = 0da495f5a80f31899139359805318f28 ocaml(Unix) = 9a46a8db115947409e54686ada118599 ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.1 ocaml-sexplib-devel-3.7.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm ocaml-sexplib-devel = 3.7.4-1.fc9 = ocaml-sexplib = 3.7.4-1.fc9 ? %check is not present, but a test suite seems to exist. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * .cma, .cmi, .so, .so.owner, META files in the main package. * .a, .cmxa, .cmx and .mli files are in the -devel subpackage. ? .cmo, .o and .ml files not included
I've added a %check section which runs the two tests. pa_sexp_conv.cmo is included, but this is OK because it is a camlp4 syntax extension, and thus expressly allowed by the new packaging guidelines. Here's a new package which corrects also the missing camlp4 BR: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib-3.7.4-2.fc9.src.rpm * Mon May 10 2008 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones> - 3.7.4-2 - Added BR ocaml-camlp4-devel. - Added a check section to run the included tests. Here's a Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=604410
Looks good to me. APPROVED
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-sexplib Short Description: OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes
cvs done.
Build fails on F-8/9 because we're still waiting for ocaml-type-conv >= 1.5.0 to migrate into stable. Built in devel.
*** Bug 1790151 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***